Categories
Practice Science

Calming our cravings

Cognac: Spot by Shaylor (flickr)

All around me today, it feels that many people find themselves immersed in craving. Much our consumer culture rests on a foundation of creating an urge to immediately purchase something or engage in an activity, encouraging impatience and baking craving into our culture. At the same time, many people are ambivalent about the impact of craving on our lives, and fear that that excessive desire will transition to dysfunction and addiction. Even so, many of us feel resigned, and do not see a path to calming our cravings.

While I have never personally struggled with an addiction, I’ve certainly felt intense desires, and found my life unsettled by the fever of craving. Perhaps the first time I noticed this was in high school, back in the 1990s. At that time, access to the internet was rare, but I attended a public residential school focused on science and math, and we had excellent internet access in our computer labs.

At some point, maybe in my junior year, a friend introduced me to a simple online text-based game (a multi-user dungeon, or MUD) based on the Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings books. While it lacked the polish of modern video games, I found myself consumed by this fantasy world as I became more invested in my character, and enmeshed in the relatively small online community. Slowly, I became more and more preoccupied with the game, spending much of my time outside of class in the computer lab, and eventually entire days on weekends.

At some point, people around me recognized that I had fallen into an unhealthy rut. They staged an impromptu quasi-intervention, and I found myself physically carried out of the computer lab. I remember being very angry, mostly out of embarrassment, but that moment did bring into focus how dysfunctional my relationship to this game had become. I could see that my life felt off balance, but for a time I still struggled to make a change and disengage from the game. In the end, I gave it up entirely, as I found that it was too difficult for me to continue to play without being pulled into preoccupation and obsession.

Since high school, similar things have happened with a few other games. While still challenging, those periods were easier to deal with, in part because I had become more aware of my own susceptibility. Also, it helped that as I’ve grown older, I quite honestly feel that I don’t want to spend hours of my limited time playing these kinds of games.

As for other kinds of addictions, I have never experienced truly intense challenges, for which I am thankful. Though I enjoy the occasional drink, I’ve been fortunate to never experience a strong draw towards alcohol or drugs. I have experienced intense, usually transitory, desires in other areas, like cravings and urges around food or sex. Or less intense, and longer lasting cravings that can draw me in to binge an excessive number of episodes of a show, or eat most of the junk food in our house (or to waste money on lottery tickets).

While none of these areas ever became dysfunctional in my life, I do remember that in some of the more intense moments when I was younger, I wished for some way to silence these cravings. I wondered if there could be some kind of drug that could go in to my brain cut off craving at its roots.

This wish to be free of craving might be part of what helped me be open to Zen practice. I was very interested to encounter teachings that pointed to greed and craving as one of the key ingredients in our suffering, and offered a path to end craving. However, when I first encountered these teachings, I think that for a long time I struggled to really understand what a healthy life without craving looks like.

Reading respected texts in the Zen tradition, I came across advice to give up our worldly sentiments, including our preferences. Or in the advice to monks to even to give up their families, which called back to the image of Siddhartha Gautama leaving his home and his wife and child to pursue practice. It seemed that the path being recommended to truly cut off craving might include severing my affections to other people, which did not feel like a healthy way to live. So, while I had some faith in the practice, I was also uncertain about what these teachings were really pointing to, or what it would mean for me to live that path today.

More recently, I was glad to come across the recent book, The Roots of Goodness, which I was reading for a discussion group. This text is a translation of Kosho Uchiyama’s commentary on Dogen’s Hachi Dainin Gaku (the eight qualities of a “great person,” or in Uchiyama’s words, a true adult) has been a real treasure for me as we explore what it means to carry practice into our whole life. The two first qualities – “having few desires,” and “knowing one has enough” – touch directly on craving, and Uchiyama’s commentary resonated deeply with me as I chew on what it means for me to live today with “few desires.”

It has also been helpful for me to look at these teachings through the lens of psychology and neuroscience. Research in these areas have explained the origins of liking (our actual experience of pleasure) and wanting (our desire to move toward that which we think we like) in a way that I think complements Zen practice.

Liking and disliking seem to be given in our lives, just as immediate and direct to us as our experience of color, or sound, or taste. But in themselves, there is nothing in the world that is inherently pleasant or unpleasant. The quality of pleasure or displeasure is fundamentally about how an event or stimulus is interpreted, or about its value to us. Pleasure and displeasure depend on specialized circuits in the brain, especially on deep structures such as the nucleus accumbens, and the ventral pallidum. Neuroscience studies suggest that these areas are critical to processes that have been called “core liking,” the basic step that the brain has to take in order to point to an experience as pleasant or unpleasant.

In these areas, the brain’s own opioids are key in signaling pleasure and displeasure. These natural opioid systems are the same ones that are exploited by drugs like oxycontin or fentanyl. In studies of rats, tiny injections of opiate drugs that manipulate directly into these systems can dramatically affect measures of liking (often measured using facial reactions).

Depending on where these drugs are placed in the brain, activating opioid receptors can dramatically increase liking facial reactions (lip smacking, and turning toward the taste) to a somewhat sweet compound, or dramatically decrease aversive facial reactions (gaping facial expressions, and turning away from the taste) to a bitter one.

Humans have similar opioid systems, and our own opioids are likely constantly tuning our responsiveness to any given sensation. This subtle tuning of our brain’s pleasure circuits is probably an important part of why the amount of enjoyment that we get from any particular experience (say a bite of chocolate) can depend on many factors, such as the needs of our body, the context we are in, and even our expectations about chocolate.

While this variability in how the brain responds to a reward may feel a bit capricious, or even unfair, it is an important part of how the brain orients us to focus on what is valuable. We generally experience something as pleasant if it is (or, if we believe that it is) helpful to continue our existence as an individual (such as food) or as a species (such as sex). Even our more abstract pleasures are fundamentally rooted in our well-being, as the pleasure that we take in learning about the world around us and in the company of others are critical to our species, and our ability to cooperate together with others. The ability to tune our liking and disliking allows us to shift our focus towards what is most valuable to us in the moment.

Desire, or wanting, is closely connected to our likes and dislikes, and the experience of desire can be colored by feelings of pleasure or displeasure. We can feel anticipation as a pleasure as we feel we are drawing close to something that we want. We can also feel desire as unpleasant, as we are impatient or feel obstructed from the object of our desire.

But, desire is a fundamentally a motivation, which propels us to move toward that which we want, and to move away from that which we do not want. Desire, or the experience of wanting, is born out of the gap between where we are and where we want to be. Or, where we imagine that we could be. Our brain’s opioids are likely important for the feelings of pleasure and displeasure that can come with desire. Other systems, such as the dopamine released in areas such as the striatum or nucleus accumbens, seem more important for wanting than for liking.

Infusions of drugs that trigger dopamine receptors directly into the brain do not seem to have a strong impact on liking or disliking in rats (as measured by facial reactions). Rather, these drugs have a powerful effect on wanting, and can increase food consumption dramatically. This is one of the reasons that drugs which act on dopamine receptors, either directly (cocaine, methamphetamine) or indirectly (alcohol, nicotine) can be addictive: they can recruit the circuits in the brain that trigger our desire.

Craving can be seen as a very intense form of wanting, falling on the far end of a normal continuum of desire. If we are very much in need of food, then experiencing something like craving is very natural and normal, as we need to find sustenance to survive. More often, we may notice craving most clearly when we are drawn towards something that we don’t really need in order to live: playing a video game, placing a bet on a game, watching pornography, eating rich foods, and such. When I think about what it means to have few desires, or to know that I have enough, I am more concerned with these kinds of moments of feverish desire than with normal pangs of hunger.

What then is the path to calming unhealthy desire? Early in my practice, I did think that teachings around attachment and desire were pointing towards the elimination of liking and disliking, or even feelings in general. Technically, this would work to eliminate desire: if we don’t enjoy anything, or dislike anything, then we never need to seek out a different state. Generally, though, a total lack of pleasure or displeasure is not a settled, balanced position, but rather a symptom of psychological challenges, such as depression. The total extinction of liking and disliking can be a great hindrance in our ability to function skillfully in the world.

Without getting rid of pleasure, it can still be possible to work more skillfully with desires and to calm our cravings. Research on meditation, and especially mindfulness-based approaches, have shown promise in this area, and can reduce craving for individuals dealing with substance use. Some of the impacts of mindfulness on cravings seem to come from shifting how people experience rewards. One important practice comes from encouraging people to more directly attend to and savor everyday positive experiences. By opening up to noticing the pleasant aspects of ordinary experience, one can find that there is an opportunity to experience pleasure even in the moments that we often pass over.

And, by also becoming more open to noticing one’s actual experience when using a substance, one may have a direct insight that many of the effects of a drug are actually unpleasant, or fall short of one’s expectations. This combination of cultivating positive emotions for natural rewards and reshaping how drug rewards are perceived can shift how the brain responds to natural and drug rewards. And this process appears to be important in decreasing drug cravings in people struggling with opioid addiction.

The body of research in this area has been very helpful in identifying some of the important mechanisms for how meditation can be supportive in calming intense cravings. This kind of knowledge is interesting even to people who are not dealing with the challenges of addiction. And, this work can be helpful in our practice, by giving us a better sense of what the specific impacts of practice may be.

But I think that the deeper point for our practice is that having few desires goes hand in hand with knowing what is truly valuable.

Liking and disliking are grounded at their roots in that which supports life (our individual lives, and that of our species). So, it makes sense that cultivating pleasure for everyday, natural rewards over drugs is a healthy shift. We should not stop there, though, and we should continue to explore what is truly valuable in life. This is especially important when it seems so easy to be captured by the pursuit of money, influence, recognition and the lot. Each may be useful, but at their heart, they are not valuable in themselves.

As Uchiyama points out later in his commentary on Hachi Dainin Gaku, it is our very life that is most valuable:

… my life is what is most important – this must be our most fundamental value. This value is not something given to us by society. The living force that flows through me is a value this is more important than anything else. The living force that I am speaking of is of one life that is inclusive of all the dharmas, all the dharmas are identical with one life.

Uchiyama, The Roots of Goodness, p. 201

I’ve come to appreciate the importance of this point, and believe that it is one that is worth exploring closely and carefully. And, while I can’t express the subtleties of Uchiyama’s point here (or probably at all!), I do want to mention how much I trust very deeply in the point that life itself is most valuable. Not our individual, or personal life. And also not life in the abstract (some intellectual appreciation). From our position as living beings, what could be more valuable than life itself?

If we step out from the position of life, and consider that of the Earth, or our solar system, or the universe, there we find that nothing is valuable, and so is nothing good or bad. Good and bad depend on having something that you value, and value itself depends on the ability to have some kind of goal or preference. From the position of a rock, there are no preferences, and nothing has value. A rock sits with an indifference that is fully outside of the understanding of a living being.

As living beings, we do not find ourselves sitting in the position of a rock, and from our position, there is good and bad. And what is good, what is most valuable, is life itself. Life has an aim, toward continuing life. Not just the life of one individual, or one organism, or one cell. Life as an individual makes no sense at all, as each living being only exists in a set of relationships with other living beings.

We will sometimes talk about the “web of life” as if it were something abstract, or separate from us personally. But the connections between living beings are deep and connect every living thing on our planet. Take any single living being and place them on Mars, and they cannot survive. If life were to ever to truly flourish on Mars someday, it will not be as an individual, but as a community, working together to support life.

Life itself is most valuable to life, and we can truly be at peace if we understand this point. Not an understanding that is just in our thoughts or beliefs, but in our bodies and in our flesh and in our bones. If we truly appreciate living – not as an idea, but as this direct moment – then likes and dislikes will still be with us, but perhaps shifted a bit. If each moment of living is truly valuable, then the so-called ordinary moments may not feel as drab or mundane. Even unpleasant moments can be held a bit more kindly, with the appreciation that these are moments of life are precious.

Knowing that life is most valuable invites us to appreciate where we are. Craving evaporates in a moment that is truly savored. At the same time, this is not a path of complacency or stagnation. To truly value life is to treasure it, to take delight in living, and in the same moment to see clearly the need to care for life. To aim our efforts towards continue to allow life (our own, our communities, our world) to flourish in a healthy way. As we move toward what we value – supporting life – we will find desires still come and go, but perhaps with somewhat softer urgency, and we may find that cravings lose their heat.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Practice Zen

The end of sesshin

I started to study Zen Buddhism more than thirty years ago, and started meditating in high school. But it was only a few years ago that I first sat a sesshin (an intensive meditation retreat) that lasted more than a couple of days. I had been interested in this intensive practice for years, almost since I had learned about Zen. At that time, I didn’t know of any temples or Zen centers near my rural hometown, so I never saw any options to explore meditation retreats.

Later, once I had moved to a larger city and was practicing with a sangha, I still never found my way to sesshin. As primarily a lay practitioner, there always seemed to be challenges to stepping out of my regular routine for more than a day or so at a time (graduate school, work, family, etc.). I see now that the bigger challenge was likely that while I had established a fairly regular meditation practice, I was more fond of the idea of meditation than I was of the actual, moment-by-moment experience of zazen. Looking back now, I think that my situation was similar to to a person who has taken up running – because they believe at an intellectual level that exercise is good. But, they don’t really enjoy running, and the activity is more closer to work, or a necessary chore. So, it’s not really surprising that I shied away from sesshin back then.

I did do a few short retreats during graduate school, but never more than a couple of days at a time. It wasn’t until more recently, after reconnecting to regular practice, that I became serious about sitting a full sesshin.

I’m not sure what really had shifted for me, but from the very beginning part of what had brought me to Zen was a hope to see reality a bit more clearly and deeply. And, I felt that retreat experience could be an important part of my practice, to help me better understand the teachings I had been working to live out. So, I decided to sit a five-day sesshin at a temple in my region, though I still had reservations.

In fact, as the starting day approached, I remember a friend asking me about the retreat, and he was curious to know if I was excited for it, or if I was looking forward to a relaxing and restorative experience. He seemed a bit puzzled when I smiled, and said that actually, I was mostly terrified. I didn’t really know if I would be able to do it, or be able to actually make it through the entire schedule.

In the end, I was right to be worried. I had been working diligently to prepare: sitting regularly and more often than usual, closely studying texts from this temple’s lineage on sesshin, and looking for advice on what I needed to do to be prepared.

All of that was helpful, but even so, I was not fully prepared for the reality of sesshin, physically and mentally. Sitting period after period on a zafu was punishing for my middle-aged body. Often the pain became overwhelming, and I found myself scrambling to find other postures (with benches, chairs) that could help me manage the deep discomfort. Along with the pain, there was fatigue, of course, and also great waves of restlessness.

I remember periods when the bell would ring to start the next 50 minutes of sitting, and panic would rise in me, resonating with the tone. I felt trapped, cornered, in those moments, and spent a good deal of time just sitting awash in those roiling feelings.

Other challenges arose: on the second day, some visual patterns that started appearing, as if the wood grain of the wall was gently flowing up, or that the knots in the wood became animated figures. While distracting, I found that by adjusting my gaze, closing my eyes slightly further, and taking off my glasses, these mild visual hallucinations were softened.

In the end, I did make it through the entire five-day retreat (though, it might be more true to say that I survived it), and I came out the other side of sesshin with a sense of relief and elation.

Since that first experience, I’ve made the effort to come back to sesshin regularly, at least once a year. When I think about what brings me back to sesshin, partly I find that I come back because I find that I am able to come back. Physically, the first experience was very challenging, but I’ve found ways to work with the worst of the pain (finding a set of options for sitting postures that I can work with, finding ways to head off visual hallucinations, etc.). That has made it possible, physically, for me to come back.

Second, while I still feel periods of fatigue, distraction, and restlessness, I’ve also found it easier to settle into the container of sesshin. There are still periods of pain, resistance, distraction and such, but overall, I have found that the time passes peacefully, and pleasantly.

While it is true that I’ve experienced periods of peace during sesshin, I don’t find myself coming back to sesshin to seek out these experiences of tranquility. There is something supportive for exploring sesshin, I don’t believe that feeling some particular way is the goal of practice, or really valuable in itself.

Originally, I think that I came to Zen because I wanted to know something, with certainty, about the nature of reality. Probably because of this, some part of me hoped for, or reached for, some kind of sudden revelation to come to me in the middle of zazen. Even though – at least intellectually – I can appreciate the trap of practicing with a gaining mind, the traces of that grasping can be subtle, and hard for me to really see.

I have had a range of experiences in sesshin, and even in that first experience of sesshin, but nothing that stood out as a sharp, specific kind of insight. Probably, these have all been in the normal range of experiences you might expect after spending hour upon hour staring at a wall. In that first sesshin, probably the most notable experience was a sense that my sense of self (the somewhat heavy or solid, self-conscious, awareness that I notice often in my moment-by-moment experience) felt a bit quieter, softer, during the retreat and for some days afterwards. There was something peaceful about that experience, and I appreciated it, in part because I was surprised by it. But if I was hoping to get something more concrete from this practice, I ended up leaving empty handed.

In the end, I feel today that this (lack of) insight was probably a gift. While part of me had always reached for certainty over ambiguity, I’ve become more wary of the certainties that might emerge from a specific experience (in meditation or otherwise). In part, this is because I am concerned that what I’ll find there has more to do what I carry in, rather than something that is true about reality. However, I do feel that some of the questions I have about reality feel more settled for me today than when I came to Zen back in high school.

I have come to accept that interconnection and emptiness are deep truths about reality, and much of my life today rests on this foundation. I did encounter teachings about these truths most directly through my study of Zen, and in learning about the natural world all around us. Nothing exists alone and separate. This is true of everything that lives, and at a deep level, it seems to also hold some truth about the very core of everything that exists. Everything is empty of an enduring, or permanent, self-nature. We see the truth of this each time we try to pin down any specific thing in the world. Every living thing is a process, endlessly in flux. And this is true of the inanimate objects around us: seeing one rock as separate from another has a usefulness as we navigate the world, but it can also be easy to see the label as more real than the direct reality in front of us.

And, I feel more comfortable with the idea that rather than being a source of these ideas, sesshin has been a particularly valuable place to explore what it means to live out these truths, moment-by-moment, in a healthy way. As I have given up (or at least become more aware of) reaching for a special kind of experience (calm, peace) or insight (some kind of new belief or certainty), I have come back to sesshin explore living out interconnection and emptiness thoroughly, without the possibility of escape or distraction.

That is not to say that I feel that I really understand sesshin yet. The experience is endlessly rich, and subtle, and I’ll often find myself trying to get my bearings on the cushion. From time to time, I’ll find myself wondering, what is it that I’m doing right now, here on this cushion? And, I’ll come back to teachings that have resonated most deeply with me, like Uchiyama’s Opening the Hand of Thought. I have a copy that I bought decades ago, and over the years I’ve found myself returning to it again and again. For a long time, I have puzzled over Uchiyama’s advice on zazen, such as “… the essential point when doing zazen is to aim, full of life, at the posture of zazen with our flesh and bones, while at the same time leaving everything up to the posture and letting go of thoughts.”1 Investigating, curiously, patiently, what it means to aim at the posture of zazen, full of life, and to let go of thoughts, has been a riddle that I keep coming back to in zazen.

That first five-day sesshin was very challenging for me, and I still have experienced pain or difficulties during sesshin. There is nothing inherently wrong with experiencing some discomfort in the body while sitting, but it can be draining to sit through intense pain.

Similarly, sitting peacefully is certainly more pleasant, but there is nothing especially valuable – in itself – about feeling good while sitting. I have certainly experienced pleasant moments on the cushion, but also noticed that my mind was a bit unfocused, or zoned out. These moments felt peaceful, but in a way that was adjacent to sleep, and not full of life.

Other times, there has been an intensity of experience, feelings of elation, or a trembling kind of joy, almost as if one was on the threshold of something. These experiences also have tones of pleasure, and perhaps a greater feeling of life in them, but in a way that feels adjacent to a fever, or of too much. These experiences make me think of Keizan’s advice in Zazen Yojinki, “during zazen, your body may feel hot or cold, rough or smooth, stiff or loose, heavy or light, or astonishingly wide-awake. Such sensations are caused by a disharmony of mind and breath.”2 Instead of getting caught up in such experiences, Keizan encourages us to see them as distractions or delusions, and not something to chase after. 

So, while I don’t think that chasing after a feeling of peace in zazen, or after any particular pleasant sensation, is the aim – or goal, or end – of zazen, I can see that aiming peacefully at this posture has been supportive in my own experience.

When I reflect on the value of sesshin in my own practice, the image that has come to me is that of zazen, and sesshin in particular, as a filter. My first full sesshin was difficult for me in a sharp way. In the challenging moments, it felt as if some rough part of me had gotten caught on the container as sesshin, showing up as suffering during pain, uncertainty, boredom, restlessness.

When sesshin has passed more peacefully, the difference has come in part by exploring (or I could say, resting in, relaxing into) the mind that can pass easily, peacefully, through sesshin. Not because it is spaced out, or unfocused. Rather, this is the mind that is full of life, coming back, moment-by-moment to the posture of zazen as the only activity. Letting go of the story of I, myself, sitting and exploring just sitting. Letting go of before and after, or here and there, trusting that each will be on hand when they are needed. Sesshin is a special, precious container, where we don’t need space and time. Resting on our trust in the jikido to keep time and manage the space of the zendo, in our fellow practitioners to support one another in our efforts, we can let go of everything and aim, moment-by-moment at the posture of zazen.

Today, while there are still periods of fatigue, of restlessness, times when I find that part of me doesn’t want to sit, I find myself catching on sesshin less often. While zazen is endlessly rich and subtle, and difficult to point to in a clear way, I generally leave sesshin with the feeling that it has passed easily, and in a timeless way. Perhaps that won’t be true in the future, perhaps these feelings have only been a temporary arrangement of causes and conditions. But it has resonated with me as something important, but not as an accomplishment, it’s not something that I’m proud of. This is the same mind that I try to bring into each moment of life. 

Off of the cushion, and out of sesshin, space and time are, of course, indispensible. What I hope to carry with me as I leave the cushion is not a state (some kind feeling, or experience), but the posture of zazen, exploring if I can meet each moment, full of life, and letting go of some of the self-focused thinking that often comes so easily, reflexively to mind.

Like zazen, it is not really my goal for my moment-by-moment life to be pleasant, but a sense of ease, openness, (and yes, pleasantness), can be supportive in relaxing any defensiveness, reactivity, and such that show up in life. In this, I feel that I’m exploring the mind that passes through each moment easily, pleasantly, but in an engaged and active way. Avoiding the option to maintain a feeling of equanimity by pulling back, holding the world at arm’s length. Or, in being drawn in, almost in a feverish way, to tension and conflict. Even this, itself, is not my goal or intention, but it feels important to me, to approach life in this way, to make my best effort to support my own well-being, and that of everyone I interact with.

  1. Kosho Uchiyama (1993), Opening the Hand of Thought, p. 66 ↩︎
  2. Keizan Jokin, Zazen Yojinki, reprinted in Soto Zen: An Introduction to Zazen, published by Sotoshu Shumucho in 2002 ↩︎

Categories
Practice Science Stress

Finding the root of anxiety

I remember a time, when my daughter was young, and we were heading home after her rehearsal for a play had ended. Someone called out a question behind me as we stepped into the crosswalk, and without a thought I looked over my shoulder to answer. Turning back around, I was face-to-face with a minivan that had been making a left turn. It had almost come right through the crosswalk, and through both my daughter and I.

By the time I turned and saw it, by the time I had even registered it, the van had already lurched to a sharp halt. Fear, sharp and immediate, stabbed at me in that moment. I still remember feeling that it was so close that I could have easily reached out my hand to touch the hood of the van. The driver, perhaps a parent of another child leaving that same rehearsal, had a look of shock on their face. I forced a tight smile, waved to say, “don’t worry, we are ok!,” and finished crossing the street. Holding my daughter’s hand a bit tighter.

Fear can be such an unpleasant experience that we might think that our lives would be better without it. But would that be really true? Looking closely, I can appreciate the value of fear. Not the experience of fear itself, but the very capacity to fear. Like a “rumble strip” running alongside a highway, it buzzes and jostles us if we drift out of the safe path. Fear grabs our body and our attention when we are face-to-face with a threat, real or imagined. We feel that rush of adrenaline and stress hormones, preparing us for a vigorous response. Our attention may narrow, drawing our focus towards dealing with the situation.

Even the very unpleasantness of fear itself can be useful, motivational – even if we are not harmed, we want to find some way to avoid these risks in the future.  So really, the value of fear – as a capacity – is easy for me to understand. An important guardrail against complacency, or overconfidence.

But anxiety, that close cousin of fear, has often felt like an entirely different matter to me. The roots of fear are in the dangers that seem to be in front of us, and in something that should be dealt with. The center of anxiety seems to be somewhere else, grounded out ahead of us, in the future. Not in what is here and now, an immediate threat, but in what is coming. Or, maybe even just in what might be coming.


Our kids attended third grade at a local school only a few blocks from our home. We were very lucky, really, that it was only a short walk or bike ride to school. Once our oldest child had settled into the route, we trusted them to make that trip on their own.

Part of me, though, was never really comfortable with the idea. Like many parents of our generation (maybe of any generation?), I worried about all the things that might happen on their bike ride to school. There were no particular risks that seemed likely, but even so, there it was, a sense of unease.

My fear sprang up in the moment from seeing a van heading toward my daughter, and my anxiety radiated diffusely out of all the “maybes” and “mights” of what might happen on a bike ride to school. So, I did worry about that trip, and especially about the highway that ran between our home and the school.

I see now that at a deep level, some of my anxiety came from how I saw my role as a parent, and how I should be able to protect my children from all harms. And that is not unreasonable, really, to understand the importance of caring for the safety and wellbeing of our children. But I didn’t see clearly at the time how it could be a different thing, to believe that this meant that I should be able to prevent every danger.

There is a line from the movie, A Quiet Place, that brought this attitude into focus for me. When their children are in danger, in a moment of panic, Emily Blunt’s character asks, “Who are we if we can’t protect them?” Who are we, indeed? Her question resonated with me, and I felt it captured something true about what I felt that is meant for me to be a parent. But when we look closely, our situations were not symmetrical: Emily Blunt was protecting her fictional children (from aliens), and my kid was riding a bike to a neighborhood school.

Anxiety is not the only flavor of suffering in our lives, but it is an important one. Sometimes, it feels like we live in an anxious time. Triggers for anxiety can come up suddenly and easily. So much so that we might feel justified to believe that a threat may jump up at any moment: in each text notification, in each email, or even in the silence (of an expected call). 

Do we need this? To be afraid of all of that which might not even be a real danger, and might not even happen? On the one hand, it seems like time and energy wasted. On the other hand, even if the risks seem unlikely, they can be difficult to set aside.

Sometimes, I feel that we approach anxiety – or any negative part of our experience – as a defect, or a corruption of our natural state. As a neuroscientist, though, I feel that this view doesn’t really fit the reality of our lives.

Pain offers a good comparison. Pain, especially when extreme and unrelenting, can be a significant source of suffering in our lives. But at its most basic level, pain exists to serve a function. Pain pulls our attention to damage in the body, moves us to take steps to protect ourselves and to allow space for healing. I don’t see any particular reason to celebrate being in pain, but I can appreciate how pain is bound up in how the body takes care of itself.

Just like the experience of pain, anxiety is a natural part of experience, and not necessarily an error. After all, dangers can (and do) come suddenly and unexpectedly. Looking ahead for those risks, we may be better able to avoid the danger, or better prepared to deal with it when it arrives. Fear has its use when a van is heading towards you and your child, and anxiety has its use when it brings us think carefully about if our child is safe making their own way to school.

And so, we are not really surprised to find that just like pain, the capacity to feel fear and anxiety depend on specialized circuits in the brain. You might be familiar with the amygdala, a pair of almond-shaped structures that sit deep in brain, roughly behind our temples. The amygdala are critical in recognizing the emotional color or tone of a situation, such as recognizing threats, and helping to start our efforts to respond. People who lack amygdala are largely freed from the experience of fear, even in very intense situations (one person was robbed at knifepoint, and felt no panic).

Another brain structure, the hippocampus, is well-known for its role in learning and memory (for instance, problems in the function of the hippocampus are a key cause of the memory impairments that are seen in the early stages of dementia). But, the hippocampus is also involved in emotion, and that part of it is tightly connected to the amygdala. Recent research with mice has shown that the cells in this part of the hippocampus are important for the experience of fear and anxiety. Largely separate sets of cells are active for each emotion: fear and anxiety turn on different circuits in the hippocampus of rats, suggesting that even in rats, the ability to be anxious is built into the brain.

If anxiety is a natural part of our experience, if it serves a function, then should we simply accept anxiety as right and inescapable? Again, the comparison to pain is helpful. Pain serves a useful function when it calls our attention to injury, helps us protect against further damage, and supports our healing. People who lack the capacity to feel pain are at great risk to suffer grave injuries.  And also, pain that becomes too intense may interfere with our ability to function in our life. In these cases, pain may no longer useful. Like pain, anxiety can serve an important function, helping us to avoid threats that may be ambiguous, or which may be coming in the future. But, our anxiety can be misaligned to our reality.

Excessive anxiety can spring from many places, and one source can be worrying – the thinking that we do around potential misfortunes (like an injury, illness, financial challenges, relationships, etc.). Worrying is a part of anxiety (like physical symptoms that we are likely familiar with). But, this type of thinking – coming back again and again to the negative things that may occur – can exacerbate and prolong anxiety. Like giving air to a flame, our worries can intensify our anxiety, letting it burn hotter and longer.

Researchers who have looked at the question of why people worry excessively have proposed that this type of thinking is a doomed attempt to apply problem-solving strategies at the wrong moment. In this view, we are essentially to trying to take control of that which is beyond of our control.

Other studies have suggested that worrying might actually be a strategy that people can use, largely unconsciously, to protect against the shock of a negative experience. This work, focused on the study of contrast avoidance, accepts the truth that we enjoy positive experiences and avoid negative ones. But, it adds that we are also motivated by the contrast when our experience changes, and the size of the shift (how much better we feel, or how much worse we feel) is important. We not only seek out pleasure, but sharp, large increases in pleasure. We not only avoid discomfort and pain, but we avoid sharp negative shifts in our emotional experience.

So in a strange way, worrying can “help” us by blunting these contrasts. By keeping ourselves in a mild negative state, if something unpleasant were to happen, the impact will be blunted (we don’t feel that much worse). And, if something positive happens, then it could feel even better than if we had already been in a relatively content state. People who are more sensitive to contrast avoidance may find themselves worrying, almost as a way to brace themselves. The emotional equivalent of tensing up to prepare for the negative impact of adversity.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.


One morning, back in that year of third grade, my wife got a call from the school principal. Don’t worry, he told her, everything is fine. They had our child at school, he continued, which was the right thing to say in the moment. But could anything be less reassuring to hear as a parent? After all, why wouldn’t you have our child? Why wouldn’t everything be fine?

Child crossing the road on a bicycle at a crosswalk
Photo credit: Sigfrid Lundberg, “Be careful at the zebra crossing,” flickr

Earlier in the morning, a car had failed to stop while our child was crossing the highway. We never learned exactly what happened, but the driver didn’t notice the crossing guard, not until it was almost too late. Fortunately, the car did lurch to a halt. But not before sliding into the crosswalk, and pushing over our child on their bicycle. The driver quickly fled the scene, without stopping to see if everyone was ok, and was never identified.

Our child picked themselves up, and finished the ride to school. Put their bike away and quietly went off to class. No one at the school knew what had happened, until the crossing guard came in after his shift, asking at the front office if the child who had biked away was ok. He quit the job later that week. I think his wife had been there that day, waiting in their car, and had seen it all. Both were shaken, and I can’t blame them for not wanting to continue. I’m glad he was there, though, and that he did his best in a tough moment.

For the rest of that year, I walked with our child to school. I can say that I did it for them: even with a new crossing guard, I don’t think they ever felt entirely safe. Part of it came from me, though, feeling the need to manage my own anxiety.

To be able to recognize anxiety, to understand it, and to be better able to deal with it has been an important part of my own life and my practice. Sometimes, my own anxiety has been out of focus, something I can’t quite see clearly. I don’t think I even could see it clearly, I couldn’t recognize it, until I saw anxiety in other people. Saw the ways in which one can be unsettled, uneasy, in ways that seem out of proportion to the danger. Even after I could recognize anxiety, I’ve missed it in my own life, only able to glimpse the shadow of my own anxiety where it falls in my life: in the thoughts that keep turning back to a concern, in vague sense of unease, some new difficulty in sleeping.

Other times, when the danger falls on us, when we get the call that we’ve been dreading, I do see that some part of me feels vindicated.  See? that voice says, quietly, I was right to worry, danger is everywhere, and only looking for some unguarded place to land.

Both kinds experience – the anxieties that are out of focus, and the worries that feel vindicated – have each been obstacles for me at times. When my anxiety floats out of the frame of my awareness, it can be difficult to see all of the ways it distorts my life. Pushing me in a directions I really wouldn’t have chosen – to be overly cautious, defensive, wound too tightly. It’s a constricted way to live, one that makes it difficult to enjoy what is present now, and to be open to finding solutions to the problems that are most likely to manifest.

When my worries end up feeling prophetic, then that justifies me to continue to be overprotective, pessimistic, to spend too much time focused on everything that I might lose. But, even if the worst really does come to pass, what will I have I achieved by practicing that loss countless times in my mind?

If worry and anxiety are a serious part of your life, I don’t know of any better place to start than working with a professional. Such as a therapist who can provide an outside perspective, someone who understands the ways that anxiety can trap us.

For my own, (usually mild to moderate) anxiety, I’ve found that just learning to notice how anxiety shows up in my own life, in my body, emotions, thoughts, has been very helpful. When I can’t see it, anxiety smolders outside of the frame, under the leaves. And sometimes, the feelings of anxiety themselves – constriction, tingling in the body, restlessness, and such – can feel like a threat, leading all of these sensations to intensify.

So, exploring being open to just noticing the sensations that come up with anxiety in an open way has been a useful first step for me. Working to be aware of these sensations, but always with a spirit of curiosity, interest.

At the same time, I might try to bring my attention also to the sensations of breathing (which has long been an important anchor for me in my meditation practice), starting with a couple of deep, abdominal breaths. And, I might also let attention be very broad, and open to sensations from throughout the body, and all of the senses (rather than focusing narrowly on any unpleasant sensations that may be coming from anxiety).

I also give some attention to the roots of my anxiety, down in the thoughts that might be driving or sustaining my unease. Sometimes, those thoughts are very clear, like when a storm came through our area the other day. My spouse and I watched uneasily as an ominous cloud pass by to the north of our home, not quite sure if we should move down to our basement for shelter.

Other times, they may be unclear, hanging somewhere outside of awareness. Then, I’ll try to be more open to noticing where these feelings are coming from, but in an easy, curious way. Maybe there is an email that I need to send, but am dreading. Or a concern about my health or that of a loved one. Or maybe a call that I am expecting, but has not come in.

Feeling for the root of anxiety, I might also notice some tension that comes from a need to control this situation (like I have felt as a parent). Or, any sense that I might be bracing myself for some potential threat (when I worry that a loved one might experience some setback or difficulty).

Exploring anxiety in this careful, direct, and intimate way has been an important first step for me in working with it more skillfully. I try to also be patient, knowing that even if I can see the roots, those difficult feelings may not immediately evaporate. Some of my patience comes from a trust that no matter how it feels in the moment, it will pass eventually. That can help me to accept the discomfort in the moment, while also still looking carefully at the situation.

In the end, if I can avoid the extremes of an avoidant withdrawal on one hand, and a panicked restlessness on the other, I might be better able to judge the challenge in front of me, and plan a better path forward.

Categories
Mindfulness Science

What is the use of mindfulness?

Mindfulness has become very popular today, and for good reason. Over the past several decades, a wide body of research has shown that mindfulness-focused programs can be helpful for stress reduction and mental health.

With the increasing popularity of mindfulness programs, it is perhaps not surprising that we see stronger and stronger claims about the benefits of mindfulness. It is easy today to find that mindfulness can improve our decision-making, intelligence, and a range of other outcomes. There is a real risk, I think, that mindfulness may become the next easy fix, that we throw at every difficulty we face. Or, just another tool for self-improvement.

If we are interested in mindfulness because we want to support the well-being of ourselves and our communities, it is important to know what the benefits of mindfulness are (and also any costs, or risks, involved in mindfulness programs).

For the past several years, I have particularly been interested in looking at the relationship of mindfulness to cognition. As many established mindfulness programs, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), focus on helping people cultivate mindfulness, which Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn defined asthe awareness that arises by paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally.”

MBSR and other mindfulness-focused programs use activities or practices that help people develop their ability to focus their attention in a non-reactive, nonjudgmental way. This practice appears to have impacts on one’s ability to regulate their emotions, and other outcomes. So, while the focus of a program like MBSR is on stress reduction (or stress resilience), some of the direct work is focused on thinking and emotion. For these reasons, it has seemed very likely to me that if mindfulness training programs are effective, this is at least partly through their effects on our patterns of thinking.

Mindfulness and decision-making

Back in 2013, a study by Drs. Andrew Hafenbrack, Zoe Kinias, and Sigal Barsade on the relationship between mindfulness and decision-making caught my attention. These researchers found that people who scored higher on a survey of mindfulness made better decisions than people who scored lower in mindfulness. Specifically, the researchers were looking at the sunk cost fallacy. This is a situation where we are more likely to stick with our plans when we have invested resources (money or time) that we cannot get back (i.e., those investments are “sunk” and cannot be recovered).

As an example, consider that you have tickets to a concert this evening, which you received for free. You’ve been looking forward to going out, but this afternoon, you started to have a painful headache. Now you would prefer to stay home and skip the concert. What will you do?

We saw Billy Joel and Sting when their concert came to Indianapolis this spring. Luckily, we were feeling healthy that night, but even if we had felt terrible that night, the sunk cost of our tickets probably would have helped us follow through with our plans!

In this kind of situation, many people feel conflicted. On the one hand, they want to follow through with their plans, but on the other hand, if you don’t feel well, you may very well not enjoy the concert, so it could make sense to stay home. When faced with this kind of decision, some people will go out, and others will stay home, as you might expect.

What is very interesting, though, is to consider how our decisions would change if the tickets had not been free. And, especially if we cannot resell the tickets or get a refund. In this kind of situation, people who spend money for their tickets (especially if the tickets were expensive) are more likely to follow through and go to the concert, even if they don’t feel well. Not everyone will do so, but you will find that more people end out going out, even though they would prefer to stay home.

This difference – that people are more likely to follow through after investing money (or time) – is an example of the sunk cost fallacy, and how our decisions can be biased by sunk costs. And, this research suggested that mindfulness could help us to resist the impact of sunk costs (and thus make better decisions).

But, are sunk costs really the key?

And, reading about the research of Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, I found it fascinating to think that mindfulness might be able to weaken the impact of sunk costs on our decisions. But, I had one concern about the original study: were the researchers really looking at sunk costs specifically?

To say that mindfulness specifically predicts our ability to resist the pressure of sunk costs requires that we have a good measure of how our behavior is impacted by sunk costs. The easiest way to do that is to study how people behave under two conditions.

First, we want to see what people choose to do when they have not invested any (or very little) money or time. And then we want to see how those choices change if they have invested money or time (and, under conditions where they can’t get their time or money back – those costs are sunk, or lost, in that sense).

In the study by Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, many of the measures they used asked people to make decisions about situations where a significant amount of time or money had been invested. But, these measures lacked comparison conditions (asking people how they would have behaved if there had been little or no prior costs).

For example, consider this question from one of the surveys in the study:

You are buying a gold ring on layaway for someone special.  It costs $200 and you have already paid $100 on it, so you owe another $100.  One day, you see in the paper that a new jewelry store is selling the same ring for only $90 as a special sale, and you can pay for it using layaway.  The new store is across the street from the old one.  If you decide to get the ring from the new store, you will not be able to get your money back from the old store, but you would save $10 overall. Would you be more likely to continue paying at the old store or buy from the new store?

From the Resistance to Sunk Costs scale

In the survey, people are asked to indicate how likely they are to stick with the ring they have placed on layaway (and still owe $100) or to switch to buying the $90 ring from the new store.

If you are someone who wants to save money, then your best option in this case is to go ahead and buy the $90 ring from the new store (saving $10). Many people agree that they would buy the cheaper ring from the new store, which is no surprise.

It is surprising, though, that a number of people will not switch stores – these people say that they will pay the remaining $100 for the ring that is already on layaway. If you find yourself in this group, it may be that you are being influenced by sunk costs: the $100 that you have already spent for this ring.

But then again, maybe that is not the reason at all. Perhaps even if the original ring was only $100, and you had been able to put it on layaway with $0 down, you would have still have stuck with this ring, instead of switching over to the cheaper option.

Why would you do this? Well, maybe you feel a sense of commitment to the first store, where you have the ring on layaway. People do this all of the time, continuing some behavior, even though it is no longer the best course of action. Psychologists call this escalation of commitment. (Side note: to be honest, “escalation” seems to be an odd term to me in this context, especially since many cases of escalation of commitment are really just situations in which we are continuing some course of action. Personally, I would say inertia, or doubling-down, would be a better way to capture this kind of situation!)

To really determine if sunk costs impacted your decision to stick with the $100 ring on layaway, I need to know how much your behavior is influenced by that first $100 that you spent. And, the Resistance to Sunk Costs measure doesn’t really capture that piece (the specific impact of the initial investment).

This wrinkle in the story about mindfulness and sunk costs caught my interest, and I found myself wondering if we could get a clearer picture of how the impact of sunk costs was related to mindfulness. So, I decided to replicate the findings from the original paper, working with students in a course on research methods and statistics in psychology.

And, after searching the literature, I found a study by Dr. JoNell Strough and colleagues (paywall) of West Virginia University, who created a survey that assessed the impact of sunk costs. Their measure presented people with eight scenarios, each involving an investment of time or money.

To zero in on sunk costs, they present each scenario twice: once where people had made little or no prior investment, and once where people had made a large prior investment.

For example, here is one question from the low/no-investment version:

You have been working on a project related to one of your hobbies. You paid hardly any money at all for supplies. Lately, you have lost interest in the project. Whenever you work on the project, you are bored and wish that you were doing something else.

And, for the high investment version, they just changed one sentence: “…You paid hardly any money at all for supplies. …becomes “… You paid a whole lot of money for supplies. …

In the survey, the high and low/no investment versions were presented to each participant separately. For each scenario, people indicate how long they are likely to continue this behavior (do they think they will finish the project?  Will they continue for a while?  Will they quit the project immediately?). For this scenario, a person who is influenced by sunk costs should say that they  will stick with the project longer if they have invested “a whole lot of” money in supplies (compared to “hardly any” money).

Across several small studies, my students and I were able to replicate the main findings from the original study (and here is the published version of the paper). People who scored higher on survey measures of mindfulness were less sensitive to sunk costs: spending money for supplies did not seem to make them more likely to stick with a project that they had no interest in. I will say, though, that this relationship was a bit weak using the survey developed by Strough and colleagues: we didn’t see a significant relationship between sunk costs and mindfulness in all of our studies.

We also made one new discovery: that people who reported higher levels of mindfulness were more willing to give up on an activity, even when they had not invested much time or money (even when they had not invested money for supplies, they were more willing to quit a project that they were no longer interested in). This relationship was stronger than the effect for sunk costs, suggests that mindfulness is not just related to a reduction in the effects of sunk costs, but also to less escalation of commitment.

It appears that more mindful individuals were less likely to “double-down” on a course of action that they were no longer interested in. And, we considered this to be another way that mindfulness was related to making better decisions.

What does it all mean?

These two studies – the original by Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, and our replication – are good examples of how psychology research can help us better understand mindfulness. But you might wonder, what does it really mean for our daily lives?

Overall, I think we have strong evidence people who score higher in mindfulness (as a trait) will also say they are more willing to give up on something (a plan, an activity, a relationship) that they no longer find valuable. Another way to say this is that more mindful people may be less likely to double down or throw good money after bad.

And, on average, this is probably a positive thing. While it is often good to be able to stick with our plans and see our commitments through, we may also value being flexible enough to make a change if it turns out that our plans are no longer in our best interest.

Will mindfulness training help me make better decisions?

Based on this research, we might hope that cultivating mindfulness (through meditation or mindfulness-based interventions) could help us be more resistant to sunk costs or doubling down.

But, the studies described above are mostly correlational: we see that people who are more mindful make better decisions, but we don’t know if developing mindfulness further would help people better resist sunk costs or escalation of commitment.

Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues did test a short-term mindfulness induction, and found that increasing mindfulness helped people give up on an undesirable course of action. We struggled to replicate this specific finding (mainly because the short-term mindfulness induction didn’t work in our study). Overall, I think it is reasonable to expect that interventions that increase mindfulness would decrease the impact of sunk costs and escalation of commitment, but I can’t say that we have firm evidence in this area: it is a reasonable expectation that hasn’t been thoroughly tested in the world.

For this reason, I really would not recommend that people promote mindfulness-based training programs as proven ways to specifically target the sunk cost bias or escalation of commitment.

Coming back to our practice

And, even if it does turn out that mindfulness-based programs can produce these changes, that would be interesting, but not necessarily very useful for us once we have taken up a practice that involves mindfulness.

To really commit to a practice of mindfulness asks of us to be aware of the trap of turning practice into just another tool for self-improvement. If we are not careful, it can be very easy to slide away from a focus on our direct experience, and to move to but judging, ranking, and living in the fantasy of a future in which we are a “better” person.

To really commit to mindfulness, to living in an “awareness that arises by paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally,” we need to be aware of all of the ways that we can get caught up in chasing after our goals, or get lost in dreams. And commit to waking up anew each time we find that we’ve lost the thread of the present moment.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Mindfulness Stress

Wading into mindfulness

“Calm Daylight” photo by Ryan Adams, Flickr

Looking back over the year, it has been a few months since I posted any new essays, and I wanted to share an update before the year comes to a close. Part of me is not surprised to see that my writing has slowed down a bit. Putting my thoughts into words has always been a struggle for me, not something that I naturally gravitate towards. So, without making a constant effort, writing is easily crowded out by other (important) parts of my life, such as family and work.

But also, our time is limited, and to take on new projects means that the energy that we invest in a new pursuit has to come from somewhere. This year, I have put more of my time into a new(ish) effort – working to bring more mindfulness programming to my college and our local community.

As I’ve mentioned before, I stumbled across Zen when I was a high school student, mainly through the book Zen Flesh, Zen Bones. My early Zen practice was mainly self-guided, since in the 1990s, I had very little access to Zen centers or temples in our rural Midwestern town. At that time, I don’t recall every coming across the concept of mindfulness, or mindfulness practice, as it is commonly used today.

In college, as I began to explore majoring in psychology, I became very interested in the science of meditation. That led me to research on meditation and Zen, and then to the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) course, which had been growing in popularity. Even at that early point in mindfulness research, I appreciated the solid body of research that was developing, which suggested that the program could be helpful for people dealing with a range of conditions (from chronic pain to anxiety and depression).

In the summer of 1998, I found myself in the fortunate position of having financial support for a summer internship (through funding my college received from the Ronald E. McNair program), which made it feasible for me to search for an unpaid summer research internship. Taking a chance, I wrote to the Center for Mindfulness at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, where Jon Kabat-Zinn had developed MBSR. I don’t still have a copy of that letter, but I am sure that it was probably very “cringey” and naïve. I likely just wrote about my interest in the program and Dr. Kabat-Zinn’s work, and asked if they might be willing to let me hang around the Center for the summer. And it was my good luck that the Center agreed to let me work on a research project.

During the summer, I had a chance to immerse myself in research, and in a real research project. My responsibilities were focused on introductory tasks, like data entry and doing an initial analysis of data from a quasi-experiment that had been conducted by members of the Center. I don’t know that the study was ever published, but it felt like very serious work to me, and it meant a great deal to me to be entrusted with any part of a real research project. For my development of an identity as a psychologist and scientist, this is still something I look back on as an important moment in my life.

And, that summer was also an important moment for my meditation practice. Because, while I was at the Center, I was also able to take the 8-week MBSR course, probably because the supervisor for my project felt it would be important for me to really understand the MBSR class. And so this MBSR class ended up being my first real exposure to meditation practice. Up to that point, all of my meditation had been self-guided, and it wasn’t until years later, after moving to Minneapolis for graduate school, that I would connect with a Zen center. So I’m grateful for my time at the Center, for both my development as a researcher and in my meditation practice.

After that summer, I really didn’t do much with MBSR professionally for quite a while. For my personal practice, I did feel that I drew on my experiences in the MBSR course, but I continued to mainly focus on Zen. In psychology, my interests shifted away from mindfulness and to focus on cognition and the brain. And, it was actually while I was at the Center for Mindfulness in ’98 that I started to become fascinated with neuroscience, and how our understanding of the physical basis of our mental experiences, including meditation, was developing at a rapid pace.

Returning to college in the fall, I decided to pursue a PhD in Neuroscience, and shifted my focus from meditation to more basic questions about learning and memory. Over the years, I have done a few projects focused on mindfulness (including one on the relationship between mindfulness and resistance to the impacts of sunk-costs), but this work never became the center of my research or teaching.

I do recall a few times where I considered seeking out training to teach MBSR, mainly for pragmatic reasons: I had a few specific research questions about mindfulness, memory, and the hippocampus. And, to pursue those questions (at a small college in a mostly rural part of the Midwest), it would have been very useful to be able to offer MBSR. But, I never found the right time to move forward with this idea.

That changed in the past couple of years. I have always recommended MBSR as something that may be helpful to anyone struggling with anxiety, depression, and stress. And coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, I found myself recommending the program to more and more people. While no single technique or approach can help everyone, I believed in MBSR and other mindfulness-based interventions, and thought they could be of help to friends, family members, colleagues, and students who seemed to be struggling.

Occasionally, someone would be interested and ask how they could learn more, or find an MBSR course. And in that moment, it hurt to realize that there really weren’t many options (locally, and in-person) that I could recommend. I just lived with that regret until January of 2023, after one-too-many conversations with someone who had really struggled in our community during the pandemic. Then, I decided that I wanted to do something, and that being able to offer MBSR could be a way to be of help to my community that would be well-aligned to my professional interests (as a psychologist and neuroscientist).

This turned out to be an opportune time to start MBSR training. Over the years, I had a strong personal Zen practice, and had completed enough intensive retreats to be eligible to start teacher training. And, while there were no in-person options for MBSR teacher training in my area, there were good virtual programs.

Perhaps one benefit of the pandemic, for me, was to have found that I had become more comfortable using tools such as Zoom in my teaching and collaborations (though I still preferred in-person classes, meetings, etc.). So, I took the plunge, and started courses through the Global Mindfulness Collaborative, finishing the first level of training (“Qualified Level 1”) in the spring of 2024. 

Over the past year, I’ve worked to bring more meditation and mindfulness practice to our community, teaching mindfulness classes at my college and offering MBSR to my campus and to the larger community by partnering with a local yoga studio (Quest for Balance Wellness).

I don’t see this work to support mindfulness practice (and MBSR) as directly related to my Zen practice. I really make an effort to approach mindfulness training as a psychologist, and offer these techniques as a secular training program (while still acknowledging the Buddhist roots of programs like MBSR). I do think that more deeply wading into mindfulness, and offering MBSR courses has been nourishing for my own practice, and that it can be very beneficial to my community. And, I’m looking forward to continuing to explore mindfulness and meditation practice with anyone who wants to learn more!

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Practice Zen

“There’s a flaw in my approach”

“Hand Sculpture” photo by Tambako the Jaguar, of a sculpture in Vaduz, Liechtenstein

The summer issue of Midwest Zen was published this month, and it includes a short essay that I shared about my own practice (“A flawed approach“). For most of this year, I have been focused mainly on my own practice and supporting meditation and mindfulness in my local community. And, this effort has come at the expense of my writing, but it is important to me to continue to share reflections on Zen practice, and I was grateful for this opportunity!

In this piece I wanted to share some challenges that I had encountered, times when practice felt difficult or unpleasant, and I really did not understand where these feelings were coming from. Over time, as I continued to sit with these moments, I began to see the ways in which my approach to practice was flawed. Underneath my efforts, just outside of my awareness, a subtle striving (that I should be getting “somewhere” in practice, or that I should feel some particular way) was at the root of my struggles. And seeing that more clearly has helped me to drop some of that striving (or at least to be more aware of it!).

I don’t know if these experiences will resonate with you, but I do hope that someone might find this piece helpful for their own practice.

The full issue of Midwest Zen (Issue 6) is available online, and as a PDF.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Ethics Practice

Nurture peace in this broken world

Princess Mononoke’s Forest Spirit (Shishigami) – Paper cut shadow box by Lorelei Schmitzer-Torbert (2020)

As we welcome the new year, our thoughts often turn to our hopes. We wish for joy and peace, for ourselves, our families, communities and the world. When we look out into the world, we never find a shortage of suffering, but this year in particular, I have noticed a quickening of the pace of suffering. Coming after the challenges of the pandemic, natural disasters, and the war in Ukraine, the scale of the loss of innocent life in Israel and Gaza these past few months has still been shocking to many. While the well of human suffering is deep, the scale of loss is really beyond our comprehension.

And while this violence may be physically distant from my own community, I see many people around me struggling greatly. Checking in with friends and family, so many have been weighed down, asking themselves, how do we go on in the face of senseless loss? As the world seems to break around us, it can be difficult to really hold on to hope that the world will know peace and joy in this new year. We may feel that we should be able to do something, to make a difference, but that we have no power to lend meaningful aid. In a real and acute way, it has felt to me like watching as someone I care about, someone I love, drowns.

At the same time, my heart goes out to those who feel the urgency of the moment. And who push for action, channeling our despair into outrage and activism. Online, I have seen people calling out Buddhists and practitioners of other religions, essentially arguing that we should feel guilty for our spiritual practice at this time. Some parts of the argument seems to be that we should be ashamed of our comfort while others suffer.

This impulse, the feeling that we must act – that we are obliged to act – resonates with me. After all, if we acknowledge the truth of interconnection, then even suffering that seems distant is part of our own life. Our actions have an impact, no matter how small. So, it may feel selfish, heartless, to be comfortable here sitting on our cushions.

Part of this reasoning strikes me as compelling: I do feel that the urgency of the moment. And yet, I worry about what we should actually do, as we get up from our cushion. If shame and outrage are our calls to action, will we be able to step forward without anger? If not, I worry that any action we take may just reinforce the conflict. Anger and guilt are compelling forces, but they do not seem to tools that are well suited to build peace.

Like wielding a blade with no handle – how could we not injure ourselves even as we try to protect others?

I do think that we are called to lend our strength to others in need. As the bodhisattva vows says, “Beings are numberless, I vow to free them.” And I see that the challenge is to see clearly if our efforts are actually helpful, to know what freedom means for all beings. And how to free any being without undermining the very peace that we hope for.

As I have thought about how to aim my own efforts towards peace, without falling into paralysis or outrage, I have found inspiration in the character of Prince Ashitaka (from Hayao Miyazaki’s beautiful film, Princess Mononoke). Dealing with a curse that falls on him early in the film, Prince Ashitaka is propelled into the middle of a conflict between forces pushing for industrialization on the one hand, and to preserve the natural world on the other.

Trailer for Miyazaki’s film, Princess Mononoke. For more on the release of Princess Mononoke in the United States, the BBC recently had a very fascinating article on the history of this version.

Prince Ashitaka is a skilled fighter, and could very likely have decided the outcome if he had chosen to align himself with one cause. But, Ashitaka refrains from taking sides, and focuses on seeing clearly what is going on, and helping all beings as best he can. This confuses everyone around him, and at one point in the film, a villager asks, “Just whose side is he on anyway?” It can be just as difficult for us today to imagine that a person could be committed to the welfare of the community as a whole, rather than their own interests, or those of their allies.

And, Ashitaka is not paralyzed by despair at the profound suffering all around him, and nor is he driven to hate and anger by the injustice in the world around him. What a delicate balance this is, to use whatever skills, talents, and privilege that we have to benefit all beings instead of serving our own interests. While Ashitaka is a fictional character, I think that the model that Miyazaki has shown us is a powerful one. It is important for us to clearly imagine what it would look like to act selflessly for peace. I think that the world would benefit if we all could carry this spirit into our own lives.

Of course, even if we do, what this effort would look like will differ for each person according to their situation. In the fictional story of Princess Mononoke, Prince Ashitaka was able to have a strong impact on the world – he found himself in a position that offered great leverage over the events around him. Part of that came from his position as an outsider, with few ties of loyalty to the parties involved. He was also a skilled warrior who had the resources to travel on his own. We may not find ourselves in a similar position, able to change the course of conflicts in the world or to even to make a major impact on an important decision in our community.

But, we can aspire to see clearly where are standing, and hope that we use whatever leverage that we have to the benefit of not just ourselves, but for the whole world. As we start this new year, that is my hope. Not that the world will be peaceful, in some permanent or final way, but that each of us will act as best we can to lend our aid to those in need.

Beyond fiction, I would also offer this quote to you, from Shohaku Okumura’s commentary on Dōgen’s Genjōkōan:

“… if we consider peace a condition in which there is no war among countries, no fighting or conflict among people, and no pain, anxiety, or struggle in our minds, there will probably never be a time when such a condition can be completely achieved. Does this make peace a meaningless dream? Not at all. According to Dōgen, our efforts to achieve peace are themselves a source of peace in each moment of each step we take toward peace.”

Shohaku Okumura, Realizing Genjokoan

Happy New Year to each of you, and I wish that you take steps to nurture peace and find joy this year.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Mindfulness Zen

Zen and the art of Demon Slayer

Image credit: Koyoharu Gotouge (ufotable/Aniplex)

This post was originally published as an opinion piece in our College’s student newspaper, The Bachelor.

Why should you meditate? You may know that meditating regularly can help us manage stress, be more productive, and support our health. There is good evidence for each of these benefits, but are these good reasons to meditate?

Personally, I do meditate regularly, but not because I want to avoid stress or be more productive. My own meditation practice started back in the late 1990s, when I was a high school student. A friend loaned me a copy of the book, Zen Flesh, Zen Bones, which included a number of stories about Zen teachers and students which fascinated me. Like the story of Ryokan, a penniless monk who gave a would-be thief the clothes off his own back as a gift. Or the story of Hakuin, accused of fathering a child, whose only reply was “Is that so?” but who took the infant into his care.

As a self-conscious teen, uncertain of my role in the world and the purpose of my life, I was drawn to these stories. And to the idea that meditation practice could give a person greater stability in life. So, I came to meditation because I wanted to live a different way, and to be a better person.

And looking back, the reason that these Zen stories caught my attention had something to do with the time and place of my childhood, growing up with the original Star Wars movies, and science fiction books such as Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land. If I were in high school today, it might be a very different story that would have prepared me to be inspired by Zen. Perhaps one like Demon Slayer (and here I am thinking of the anime version – I have not read the original manga). If you are not familiar with it, Demon Slayer is a beautiful (though often bloody and violent) story.

And if you are familiar with Demon Slayer, consider the hero, young Tanjiro. A boy with a kind and pure soul who loses almost all of his family in a violent attack by a demon. To save his younger sister, Tanjiro commits himself to joining the “demon slayers,” a group that trains in an esoteric style of (magical) sword fighting to kill demons and protect the public. And through it all, Tanjiro dedicates his life to cultivating strength without sacrificing his humanity.

As a Zen practitioner, Tanjiro and his journey resonates deeply with me. The demon slayers develop powerful sword fighting skills through training that is rooted in a set of breathing techniques and physical conditioning. They train and struggle intensely, but often progress comes as they become more aware and attuned to their senses and bodies, letting them see their experience in new and unexpected ways.

This reminds me precisely of meditation practice in Zen and mindfulness. The specific techniques vary across meditation traditions, but focus on bringing greater awareness to the full range of our experience. We just sit with our minds, but it can be a challenging experience. It is often said that meditation practice is simple, but not easy, and that has been true for me. Meditation can often be challenging, uncomfortable, and frustrating if we struggle with uncomfortable sensations, feelings, and thoughts.

But even so, if we continue to sit with our own minds, carefully and intentionally bringing awareness to our experience without judgment, we may feel our experience shifting. Over time, we may see our experience in new ways, giving us a better understanding of our lives. With some patience, we might be able to find more space in our lives, to live in a different and more settled way.

So why should you meditate? Perhaps you find the potential for self-transformation to be inspiring. Or perhaps not. Maybe managing stress or being more productive is a stronger draw for you. That is fine: any of these would be wonderful reasons to start your meditation practice. But if you stick with meditation, don’t be surprised to find your motivation changing as your practice deepens. I never did manage to turn myself into a different person, but I am more comfortable living as myself. 

If you do decide to take the first step, I’d recommend reading about meditation and joining a meditation group. It is very helpful to sit with others, and it is easier than ever to connect with groups through Zoom. And, we have a campus meditation group meets each week, usually over the lunch hour on Mondays. You can find us on Engage, or just email me to join our mailing list. For those new to meditation, one book that I would recommend is Gunaratana’s Mindfulness in Plain English.  And, while my own background is mainly in Zen Buddhism and mindfulness, you can find excellent meditation guides in many spiritual traditions.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Reality Science Zen

Time on our minds

Time” by Dominic Hargreaves

This week, I have a new article appearing on the Tricycle magazine website (“Letting Go of Time“), which I wanted to share.

In this piece I take a close look at our perceptions of time. In general, I usually think of time as being stable, constant, reliable. But, my own experience of time can be quite variable: time can seem to flow quickly, or slow to a crawl.

Using my own background as a neuroscientist and my Zen practice, I feel that I can see more clearly how time, the time we actually live, depends on the brain.

And, reflecting carefully on time has been very helpful for me, personally, to cultivate a deeper, more authentic patience. To be more present in my own life. For that, I am very grateful.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Reality

What lies beyond fair and unfair?

Image credit: Eric Tompkins, Midwest Zen, Issue 4

The summer issue of Midwest Zen was published today, and I was happy to have an essay included (“Beyond Fair and Unfair“). After losing my brother to cancer this past March, I’ve struggled to really express what that loss meant to me, and to so many of us who loved him. I tried to put part of that to words for his funeral service, but felt that I had to leave so much out.

This essay focuses on another part of that experience, on the injustice of losing a loved one at young age. I struggled with this a great deal, with the fact that it was so unfair.

Eventually, though, I started to see more clearly that this anger was misplaced, or at least it was for me. When I look closely, I can see that “fair” is way that we give a name to how people treat other people. And so, fairness stands outside of a serious illness like cancer. Fair and unfair do not really apply, even though that felt wrong to me, and still feels wrong to me at times.

In the end, there came a time when I saw clearly that my anger was not useful, and I had to set my own ideas of fair and unfair aside, to deal with what was really in front of me.

But, I still believe in fairness though:

That is not to say that we should discard fair and unfair entirely. Fair and unfair are ideas, constructions of our minds, but not in the sense that they are fictions. Not in the sense that seeing through fair and unfair frees us to be callous, or selfish. Not in that way at all. Fair and unfair are just ideas, but ones which matter precisely in the actions we take that affect other people. They matter in how we treat one another. They are a profound treasure for people who aspire to live together in peace.

The full issue of Midwest Zen (Issue 4) is available online, and as a PDF.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.