Categories
Practice Science Stress

Finding the root of anxiety

I remember a time, when my daughter was young, and we were heading home after her rehearsal for a play had ended. Someone called out a question behind me as we stepped into the crosswalk, and without a thought I looked over my shoulder to answer. Turning back around, I was face-to-face with a minivan that had been making a left turn. It had almost come right through the crosswalk, and through both my daughter and I.

By the time I turned and saw it, by the time I had even registered it, the van had already lurched to a sharp halt. Fear, sharp and immediate, stabbed at me in that moment. I still remember feeling that it was so close that I could have easily reached out my hand to touch the hood of the van. The driver, perhaps a parent of another child leaving that same rehearsal, had a look of shock on their face. I forced a tight smile, waved to say, “don’t worry, we are ok!,” and finished crossing the street. Holding my daughter’s hand a bit tighter.

Fear can be such an unpleasant experience that we might think that our lives would be better without it. But would that be really true? Looking closely, I can appreciate the value of fear. Not the experience of fear itself, but the very capacity to fear. Like a “rumble strip” running alongside a highway, it buzzes and jostles us if we drift out of the safe path. Fear grabs our body and our attention when we are face-to-face with a threat, real or imagined. We feel that rush of adrenaline and stress hormones, preparing us for a vigorous response. Our attention may narrow, drawing our focus towards dealing with the situation.

Even the very unpleasantness of fear itself can be useful, motivational – even if we are not harmed, we want to find some way to avoid these risks in the future.  So really, the value of fear – as a capacity – is easy for me to understand. An important guardrail against complacency, or overconfidence.

But anxiety, that close cousin of fear, has often felt like an entirely different matter to me. The roots of fear are in the dangers that seem to be in front of us, and in something that should be dealt with. The center of anxiety seems to be somewhere else, grounded out ahead of us, in the future. Not in what is here and now, an immediate threat, but in what is coming. Or, maybe even just in what might be coming.


Our kids attended third grade at a local school only a few blocks from our home. We were very lucky, really, that it was only a short walk or bike ride to school. Once our oldest child had settled into the route, we trusted them to make that trip on their own.

Part of me, though, was never really comfortable with the idea. Like many parents of our generation (maybe of any generation?), I worried about all the things that might happen on their bike ride to school. There were no particular risks that seemed likely, but even so, there it was, a sense of unease.

My fear sprang up in the moment from seeing a van heading toward my daughter, and my anxiety radiated diffusely out of all the “maybes” and “mights” of what might happen on a bike ride to school. So, I did worry about that trip, and especially about the highway that ran between our home and the school.

I see now that at a deep level, some of my anxiety came from how I saw my role as a parent, and how I should be able to protect my children from all harms. And that is not unreasonable, really, to understand the importance of caring for the safety and wellbeing of our children. But I didn’t see clearly at the time how it could be a different thing, to believe that this meant that I should be able to prevent every danger.

There is a line from the movie, A Quiet Place, that brought this attitude into focus for me. When their children are in danger, in a moment of panic, Emily Blunt’s character asks, “Who are we if we can’t protect them?” Who are we, indeed? Her question resonated with me, and I felt it captured something true about what I felt that is meant for me to be a parent. But when we look closely, our situations were not symmetrical: Emily Blunt was protecting her fictional children (from aliens), and my kid was riding a bike to a neighborhood school.

Anxiety is not the only flavor of suffering in our lives, but it is an important one. Sometimes, it feels like we live in an anxious time. Triggers for anxiety can come up suddenly and easily. So much so that we might feel justified to believe that a threat may jump up at any moment: in each text notification, in each email, or even in the silence (of an expected call). 

Do we need this? To be afraid of all of that which might not even be a real danger, and might not even happen? On the one hand, it seems like time and energy wasted. On the other hand, even if the risks seem unlikely, they can be difficult to set aside.

Sometimes, I feel that we approach anxiety – or any negative part of our experience – as a defect, or a corruption of our natural state. As a neuroscientist, though, I feel that this view doesn’t really fit the reality of our lives.

Pain offers a good comparison. Pain, especially when extreme and unrelenting, can be a significant source of suffering in our lives. But at its most basic level, pain exists to serve a function. Pain pulls our attention to damage in the body, moves us to take steps to protect ourselves and to allow space for healing. I don’t see any particular reason to celebrate being in pain, but I can appreciate how pain is bound up in how the body takes care of itself.

Just like the experience of pain, anxiety is a natural part of experience, and not necessarily an error. After all, dangers can (and do) come suddenly and unexpectedly. Looking ahead for those risks, we may be better able to avoid the danger, or better prepared to deal with it when it arrives. Fear has its use when a van is heading towards you and your child, and anxiety has its use when it brings us think carefully about if our child is safe making their own way to school.

And so, we are not really surprised to find that just like pain, the capacity to feel fear and anxiety depend on specialized circuits in the brain. You might be familiar with the amygdala, a pair of almond-shaped structures that sit deep in brain, roughly behind our temples. The amygdala are critical in recognizing the emotional color or tone of a situation, such as recognizing threats, and helping to start our efforts to respond. People who lack amygdala are largely freed from the experience of fear, even in very intense situations (one person was robbed at knifepoint, and felt no panic).

Another brain structure, the hippocampus, is well-known for its role in learning and memory (for instance, problems in the function of the hippocampus are a key cause of the memory impairments that are seen in the early stages of dementia). But, the hippocampus is also involved in emotion, and that part of it is tightly connected to the amygdala. Recent research with mice has shown that the cells in this part of the hippocampus are important for the experience of fear and anxiety. Largely separate sets of cells are active for each emotion: fear and anxiety turn on different circuits in the hippocampus of rats, suggesting that even in rats, the ability to be anxious is built into the brain.

If anxiety is a natural part of our experience, if it serves a function, then should we simply accept anxiety as right and inescapable? Again, the comparison to pain is helpful. Pain serves a useful function when it calls our attention to injury, helps us protect against further damage, and supports our healing. People who lack the capacity to feel pain are at great risk to suffer grave injuries.  And also, pain that becomes too intense may interfere with our ability to function in our life. In these cases, pain may no longer useful. Like pain, anxiety can serve an important function, helping us to avoid threats that may be ambiguous, or which may be coming in the future. But, our anxiety can be misaligned to our reality.

Excessive anxiety can spring from many places, and one source can be worrying – the thinking that we do around potential misfortunes (like an injury, illness, financial challenges, relationships, etc.). Worrying is a part of anxiety (like physical symptoms that we are likely familiar with). But, this type of thinking – coming back again and again to the negative things that may occur – can exacerbate and prolong anxiety. Like giving air to a flame, our worries can intensify our anxiety, letting it burn hotter and longer.

Researchers who have looked at the question of why people worry excessively have proposed that this type of thinking is a doomed attempt to apply problem-solving strategies at the wrong moment. In this view, we are essentially to trying to take control of that which is beyond of our control.

Other studies have suggested that worrying might actually be a strategy that people can use, largely unconsciously, to protect against the shock of a negative experience. This work, focused on the study of contrast avoidance, accepts the truth that we enjoy positive experiences and avoid negative ones. But, it adds that we are also motivated by the contrast when our experience changes, and the size of the shift (how much better we feel, or how much worse we feel) is important. We not only seek out pleasure, but sharp, large increases in pleasure. We not only avoid discomfort and pain, but we avoid sharp negative shifts in our emotional experience.

So in a strange way, worrying can “help” us by blunting these contrasts. By keeping ourselves in a mild negative state, if something unpleasant were to happen, the impact will be blunted (we don’t feel that much worse). And, if something positive happens, then it could feel even better than if we had already been in a relatively content state. People who are more sensitive to contrast avoidance may find themselves worrying, almost as a way to brace themselves. The emotional equivalent of tensing up to prepare for the negative impact of adversity.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.


One morning, back in that year of third grade, my wife got a call from the school principal. Don’t worry, he told her, everything is fine. They had our child at school, he continued, which was the right thing to say in the moment. But could anything be less reassuring to hear as a parent? After all, why wouldn’t you have our child? Why wouldn’t everything be fine?

Child crossing the road on a bicycle at a crosswalk
Photo credit: Sigfrid Lundberg, “Be careful at the zebra crossing,” flickr

Earlier in the morning, a car had failed to stop while our child was crossing the highway. We never learned exactly what happened, but the driver didn’t notice the crossing guard, not until it was almost too late. Fortunately, the car did lurch to a halt. But not before sliding into the crosswalk, and pushing over our child on their bicycle. The driver quickly fled the scene, without stopping to see if everyone was ok, and was never identified.

Our child picked themselves up, and finished the ride to school. Put their bike away and quietly went off to class. No one at the school knew what had happened, until the crossing guard came in after his shift, asking at the front office if the child who had biked away was ok. He quit the job later that week. I think his wife had been there that day, waiting in their car, and had seen it all. Both were shaken, and I can’t blame them for not wanting to continue. I’m glad he was there, though, and that he did his best in a tough moment.

For the rest of that year, I walked with our child to school. I can say that I did it for them: even with a new crossing guard, I don’t think they ever felt entirely safe. Part of it came from me, though, feeling the need to manage my own anxiety.

To be able to recognize anxiety, to understand it, and to be better able to deal with it has been an important part of my own life and my practice. Sometimes, my own anxiety has been out of focus, something I can’t quite see clearly. I don’t think I even could see it clearly, I couldn’t recognize it, until I saw anxiety in other people. Saw the ways in which one can be unsettled, uneasy, in ways that seem out of proportion to the danger. Even after I could recognize anxiety, I’ve missed it in my own life, only able to glimpse the shadow of my own anxiety where it falls in my life: in the thoughts that keep turning back to a concern, in vague sense of unease, some new difficulty in sleeping.

Other times, when the danger falls on us, when we get the call that we’ve been dreading, I do see that some part of me feels vindicated.  See? that voice says, quietly, I was right to worry, danger is everywhere, and only looking for some unguarded place to land.

Both kinds experience – the anxieties that are out of focus, and the worries that feel vindicated – have each been obstacles for me at times. When my anxiety floats out of the frame of my awareness, it can be difficult to see all of the ways it distorts my life. Pushing me in a directions I really wouldn’t have chosen – to be overly cautious, defensive, wound too tightly. It’s a constricted way to live, one that makes it difficult to enjoy what is present now, and to be open to finding solutions to the problems that are most likely to manifest.

When my worries end up feeling prophetic, then that justifies me to continue to be overprotective, pessimistic, to spend too much time focused on everything that I might lose. But, even if the worst really does come to pass, what will I have I achieved by practicing that loss countless times in my mind?

If worry and anxiety are a serious part of your life, I don’t know of any better place to start than working with a professional. Such as a therapist who can provide an outside perspective, someone who understands the ways that anxiety can trap us.

For my own, (usually mild to moderate) anxiety, I’ve found that just learning to notice how anxiety shows up in my own life, in my body, emotions, thoughts, has been very helpful. When I can’t see it, anxiety smolders outside of the frame, under the leaves. And sometimes, the feelings of anxiety themselves – constriction, tingling in the body, restlessness, and such – can feel like a threat, leading all of these sensations to intensify.

So, exploring being open to just noticing the sensations that come up with anxiety in an open way has been a useful first step for me. Working to be aware of these sensations, but always with a spirit of curiosity, interest.

At the same time, I might try to bring my attention also to the sensations of breathing (which has long been an important anchor for me in my meditation practice), starting with a couple of deep, abdominal breaths. And, I might also let attention be very broad, and open to sensations from throughout the body, and all of the senses (rather than focusing narrowly on any unpleasant sensations that may be coming from anxiety).

I also give some attention to the roots of my anxiety, down in the thoughts that might be driving or sustaining my unease. Sometimes, those thoughts are very clear, like when a storm came through our area the other day. My spouse and I watched uneasily as an ominous cloud pass by to the north of our home, not quite sure if we should move down to our basement for shelter.

Other times, they may be unclear, hanging somewhere outside of awareness. Then, I’ll try to be more open to noticing where these feelings are coming from, but in an easy, curious way. Maybe there is an email that I need to send, but am dreading. Or a concern about my health or that of a loved one. Or maybe a call that I am expecting, but has not come in.

Feeling for the root of anxiety, I might also notice some tension that comes from a need to control this situation (like I have felt as a parent). Or, any sense that I might be bracing myself for some potential threat (when I worry that a loved one might experience some setback or difficulty).

Exploring anxiety in this careful, direct, and intimate way has been an important first step for me in working with it more skillfully. I try to also be patient, knowing that even if I can see the roots, those difficult feelings may not immediately evaporate. Some of my patience comes from a trust that no matter how it feels in the moment, it will pass eventually. That can help me to accept the discomfort in the moment, while also still looking carefully at the situation.

In the end, if I can avoid the extremes of an avoidant withdrawal on one hand, and a panicked restlessness on the other, I might be better able to judge the challenge in front of me, and plan a better path forward.

Categories
Mindfulness Science

What is the use of mindfulness?

Mindfulness has become very popular today, and for good reason. Over the past several decades, a wide body of research has shown that mindfulness-focused programs can be helpful for stress reduction and mental health.

With the increasing popularity of mindfulness programs, it is perhaps not surprising that we see stronger and stronger claims about the benefits of mindfulness. It is easy today to find that mindfulness can improve our decision-making, intelligence, and a range of other outcomes. There is a real risk, I think, that mindfulness may become the next easy fix, that we throw at every difficulty we face. Or, just another tool for self-improvement.

If we are interested in mindfulness because we want to support the well-being of ourselves and our communities, it is important to know what the benefits of mindfulness are (and also any costs, or risks, involved in mindfulness programs).

For the past several years, I have particularly been interested in looking at the relationship of mindfulness to cognition. As many established mindfulness programs, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), focus on helping people cultivate mindfulness, which Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn defined asthe awareness that arises by paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally.”

MBSR and other mindfulness-focused programs use activities or practices that help people develop their ability to focus their attention in a non-reactive, nonjudgmental way. This practice appears to have impacts on one’s ability to regulate their emotions, and other outcomes. So, while the focus of a program like MBSR is on stress reduction (or stress resilience), some of the direct work is focused on thinking and emotion. For these reasons, it has seemed very likely to me that if mindfulness training programs are effective, this is at least partly through their effects on our patterns of thinking.

Mindfulness and decision-making

Back in 2013, a study by Drs. Andrew Hafenbrack, Zoe Kinias, and Sigal Barsade on the relationship between mindfulness and decision-making caught my attention. These researchers found that people who scored higher on a survey of mindfulness made better decisions than people who scored lower in mindfulness. Specifically, the researchers were looking at the sunk cost fallacy. This is a situation where we are more likely to stick with our plans when we have invested resources (money or time) that we cannot get back (i.e., those investments are “sunk” and cannot be recovered).

As an example, consider that you have tickets to a concert this evening, which you received for free. You’ve been looking forward to going out, but this afternoon, you started to have a painful headache. Now you would prefer to stay home and skip the concert. What will you do?

We saw Billy Joel and Sting when their concert came to Indianapolis this spring. Luckily, we were feeling healthy that night, but even if we had felt terrible that night, the sunk cost of our tickets probably would have helped us follow through with our plans!

In this kind of situation, many people feel conflicted. On the one hand, they want to follow through with their plans, but on the other hand, if you don’t feel well, you may very well not enjoy the concert, so it could make sense to stay home. When faced with this kind of decision, some people will go out, and others will stay home, as you might expect.

What is very interesting, though, is to consider how our decisions would change if the tickets had not been free. And, especially if we cannot resell the tickets or get a refund. In this kind of situation, people who spend money for their tickets (especially if the tickets were expensive) are more likely to follow through and go to the concert, even if they don’t feel well. Not everyone will do so, but you will find that more people end out going out, even though they would prefer to stay home.

This difference – that people are more likely to follow through after investing money (or time) – is an example of the sunk cost fallacy, and how our decisions can be biased by sunk costs. And, this research suggested that mindfulness could help us to resist the impact of sunk costs (and thus make better decisions).

But, are sunk costs really the key?

And, reading about the research of Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, I found it fascinating to think that mindfulness might be able to weaken the impact of sunk costs on our decisions. But, I had one concern about the original study: were the researchers really looking at sunk costs specifically?

To say that mindfulness specifically predicts our ability to resist the pressure of sunk costs requires that we have a good measure of how our behavior is impacted by sunk costs. The easiest way to do that is to study how people behave under two conditions.

First, we want to see what people choose to do when they have not invested any (or very little) money or time. And then we want to see how those choices change if they have invested money or time (and, under conditions where they can’t get their time or money back – those costs are sunk, or lost, in that sense).

In the study by Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, many of the measures they used asked people to make decisions about situations where a significant amount of time or money had been invested. But, these measures lacked comparison conditions (asking people how they would have behaved if there had been little or no prior costs).

For example, consider this question from one of the surveys in the study:

You are buying a gold ring on layaway for someone special.  It costs $200 and you have already paid $100 on it, so you owe another $100.  One day, you see in the paper that a new jewelry store is selling the same ring for only $90 as a special sale, and you can pay for it using layaway.  The new store is across the street from the old one.  If you decide to get the ring from the new store, you will not be able to get your money back from the old store, but you would save $10 overall. Would you be more likely to continue paying at the old store or buy from the new store?

From the Resistance to Sunk Costs scale

In the survey, people are asked to indicate how likely they are to stick with the ring they have placed on layaway (and still owe $100) or to switch to buying the $90 ring from the new store.

If you are someone who wants to save money, then your best option in this case is to go ahead and buy the $90 ring from the new store (saving $10). Many people agree that they would buy the cheaper ring from the new store, which is no surprise.

It is surprising, though, that a number of people will not switch stores – these people say that they will pay the remaining $100 for the ring that is already on layaway. If you find yourself in this group, it may be that you are being influenced by sunk costs: the $100 that you have already spent for this ring.

But then again, maybe that is not the reason at all. Perhaps even if the original ring was only $100, and you had been able to put it on layaway with $0 down, you would have still have stuck with this ring, instead of switching over to the cheaper option.

Why would you do this? Well, maybe you feel a sense of commitment to the first store, where you have the ring on layaway. People do this all of the time, continuing some behavior, even though it is no longer the best course of action. Psychologists call this escalation of commitment. (Side note: to be honest, “escalation” seems to be an odd term to me in this context, especially since many cases of escalation of commitment are really just situations in which we are continuing some course of action. Personally, I would say inertia, or doubling-down, would be a better way to capture this kind of situation!)

To really determine if sunk costs impacted your decision to stick with the $100 ring on layaway, I need to know how much your behavior is influenced by that first $100 that you spent. And, the Resistance to Sunk Costs measure doesn’t really capture that piece (the specific impact of the initial investment).

This wrinkle in the story about mindfulness and sunk costs caught my interest, and I found myself wondering if we could get a clearer picture of how the impact of sunk costs was related to mindfulness. So, I decided to replicate the findings from the original paper, working with students in a course on research methods and statistics in psychology.

And, after searching the literature, I found a study by Dr. JoNell Strough and colleagues (paywall) of West Virginia University, who created a survey that assessed the impact of sunk costs. Their measure presented people with eight scenarios, each involving an investment of time or money.

To zero in on sunk costs, they present each scenario twice: once where people had made little or no prior investment, and once where people had made a large prior investment.

For example, here is one question from the low/no-investment version:

You have been working on a project related to one of your hobbies. You paid hardly any money at all for supplies. Lately, you have lost interest in the project. Whenever you work on the project, you are bored and wish that you were doing something else.

And, for the high investment version, they just changed one sentence: “…You paid hardly any money at all for supplies. …becomes “… You paid a whole lot of money for supplies. …

In the survey, the high and low/no investment versions were presented to each participant separately. For each scenario, people indicate how long they are likely to continue this behavior (do they think they will finish the project?  Will they continue for a while?  Will they quit the project immediately?). For this scenario, a person who is influenced by sunk costs should say that they  will stick with the project longer if they have invested “a whole lot of” money in supplies (compared to “hardly any” money).

Across several small studies, my students and I were able to replicate the main findings from the original study (and here is the published version of the paper). People who scored higher on survey measures of mindfulness were less sensitive to sunk costs: spending money for supplies did not seem to make them more likely to stick with a project that they had no interest in. I will say, though, that this relationship was a bit weak using the survey developed by Strough and colleagues: we didn’t see a significant relationship between sunk costs and mindfulness in all of our studies.

We also made one new discovery: that people who reported higher levels of mindfulness were more willing to give up on an activity, even when they had not invested much time or money (even when they had not invested money for supplies, they were more willing to quit a project that they were no longer interested in). This relationship was stronger than the effect for sunk costs, suggests that mindfulness is not just related to a reduction in the effects of sunk costs, but also to less escalation of commitment.

It appears that more mindful individuals were less likely to “double-down” on a course of action that they were no longer interested in. And, we considered this to be another way that mindfulness was related to making better decisions.

What does it all mean?

These two studies – the original by Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues, and our replication – are good examples of how psychology research can help us better understand mindfulness. But you might wonder, what does it really mean for our daily lives?

Overall, I think we have strong evidence people who score higher in mindfulness (as a trait) will also say they are more willing to give up on something (a plan, an activity, a relationship) that they no longer find valuable. Another way to say this is that more mindful people may be less likely to double down or throw good money after bad.

And, on average, this is probably a positive thing. While it is often good to be able to stick with our plans and see our commitments through, we may also value being flexible enough to make a change if it turns out that our plans are no longer in our best interest.

Will mindfulness training help me make better decisions?

Based on this research, we might hope that cultivating mindfulness (through meditation or mindfulness-based interventions) could help us be more resistant to sunk costs or doubling down.

But, the studies described above are mostly correlational: we see that people who are more mindful make better decisions, but we don’t know if developing mindfulness further would help people better resist sunk costs or escalation of commitment.

Dr. Hafenbrack and colleagues did test a short-term mindfulness induction, and found that increasing mindfulness helped people give up on an undesirable course of action. We struggled to replicate this specific finding (mainly because the short-term mindfulness induction didn’t work in our study). Overall, I think it is reasonable to expect that interventions that increase mindfulness would decrease the impact of sunk costs and escalation of commitment, but I can’t say that we have firm evidence in this area: it is a reasonable expectation that hasn’t been thoroughly tested in the world.

For this reason, I really would not recommend that people promote mindfulness-based training programs as proven ways to specifically target the sunk cost bias or escalation of commitment.

Coming back to our practice

And, even if it does turn out that mindfulness-based programs can produce these changes, that would be interesting, but not necessarily very useful for us once we have taken up a practice that involves mindfulness.

To really commit to a practice of mindfulness asks of us to be aware of the trap of turning practice into just another tool for self-improvement. If we are not careful, it can be very easy to slide away from a focus on our direct experience, and to move to but judging, ranking, and living in the fantasy of a future in which we are a “better” person.

To really commit to mindfulness, to living in an “awareness that arises by paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally,” we need to be aware of all of the ways that we can get caught up in chasing after our goals, or get lost in dreams. And commit to waking up anew each time we find that we’ve lost the thread of the present moment.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Mindfulness Stress

Wading into mindfulness

“Calm Daylight” photo by Ryan Adams, Flickr

Looking back over the year, it has been a few months since I posted any new essays, and I wanted to share an update before the year comes to a close. Part of me is not surprised to see that my writing has slowed down a bit. Putting my thoughts into words has always been a struggle for me, not something that I naturally gravitate towards. So, without making a constant effort, writing is easily crowded out by other (important) parts of my life, such as family and work.

But also, our time is limited, and to take on new projects means that the energy that we invest in a new pursuit has to come from somewhere. This year, I have put more of my time into a new(ish) effort – working to bring more mindfulness programming to my college and our local community.

As I’ve mentioned before, I stumbled across Zen when I was a high school student, mainly through the book Zen Flesh, Zen Bones. My early Zen practice was mainly self-guided, since in the 1990s, I had very little access to Zen centers or temples in our rural Midwestern town. At that time, I don’t recall every coming across the concept of mindfulness, or mindfulness practice, as it is commonly used today.

In college, as I began to explore majoring in psychology, I became very interested in the science of meditation. That led me to research on meditation and Zen, and then to the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) course, which had been growing in popularity. Even at that early point in mindfulness research, I appreciated the solid body of research that was developing, which suggested that the program could be helpful for people dealing with a range of conditions (from chronic pain to anxiety and depression).

In the summer of 1998, I found myself in the fortunate position of having financial support for a summer internship (through funding my college received from the Ronald E. McNair program), which made it feasible for me to search for an unpaid summer research internship. Taking a chance, I wrote to the Center for Mindfulness at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, where Jon Kabat-Zinn had developed MBSR. I don’t still have a copy of that letter, but I am sure that it was probably very “cringey” and naïve. I likely just wrote about my interest in the program and Dr. Kabat-Zinn’s work, and asked if they might be willing to let me hang around the Center for the summer. And it was my good luck that the Center agreed to let me work on a research project.

During the summer, I had a chance to immerse myself in research, and in a real research project. My responsibilities were focused on introductory tasks, like data entry and doing an initial analysis of data from a quasi-experiment that had been conducted by members of the Center. I don’t know that the study was ever published, but it felt like very serious work to me, and it meant a great deal to me to be entrusted with any part of a real research project. For my development of an identity as a psychologist and scientist, this is still something I look back on as an important moment in my life.

And, that summer was also an important moment for my meditation practice. Because, while I was at the Center, I was also able to take the 8-week MBSR course, probably because the supervisor for my project felt it would be important for me to really understand the MBSR class. And so this MBSR class ended up being my first real exposure to meditation practice. Up to that point, all of my meditation had been self-guided, and it wasn’t until years later, after moving to Minneapolis for graduate school, that I would connect with a Zen center. So I’m grateful for my time at the Center, for both my development as a researcher and in my meditation practice.

After that summer, I really didn’t do much with MBSR professionally for quite a while. For my personal practice, I did feel that I drew on my experiences in the MBSR course, but I continued to mainly focus on Zen. In psychology, my interests shifted away from mindfulness and to focus on cognition and the brain. And, it was actually while I was at the Center for Mindfulness in ’98 that I started to become fascinated with neuroscience, and how our understanding of the physical basis of our mental experiences, including meditation, was developing at a rapid pace.

Returning to college in the fall, I decided to pursue a PhD in Neuroscience, and shifted my focus from meditation to more basic questions about learning and memory. Over the years, I have done a few projects focused on mindfulness (including one on the relationship between mindfulness and resistance to the impacts of sunk-costs), but this work never became the center of my research or teaching.

I do recall a few times where I considered seeking out training to teach MBSR, mainly for pragmatic reasons: I had a few specific research questions about mindfulness, memory, and the hippocampus. And, to pursue those questions (at a small college in a mostly rural part of the Midwest), it would have been very useful to be able to offer MBSR. But, I never found the right time to move forward with this idea.

That changed in the past couple of years. I have always recommended MBSR as something that may be helpful to anyone struggling with anxiety, depression, and stress. And coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, I found myself recommending the program to more and more people. While no single technique or approach can help everyone, I believed in MBSR and other mindfulness-based interventions, and thought they could be of help to friends, family members, colleagues, and students who seemed to be struggling.

Occasionally, someone would be interested and ask how they could learn more, or find an MBSR course. And in that moment, it hurt to realize that there really weren’t many options (locally, and in-person) that I could recommend. I just lived with that regret until January of 2023, after one-too-many conversations with someone who had really struggled in our community during the pandemic. Then, I decided that I wanted to do something, and that being able to offer MBSR could be a way to be of help to my community that would be well-aligned to my professional interests (as a psychologist and neuroscientist).

This turned out to be an opportune time to start MBSR training. Over the years, I had a strong personal Zen practice, and had completed enough intensive retreats to be eligible to start teacher training. And, while there were no in-person options for MBSR teacher training in my area, there were good virtual programs.

Perhaps one benefit of the pandemic, for me, was to have found that I had become more comfortable using tools such as Zoom in my teaching and collaborations (though I still preferred in-person classes, meetings, etc.). So, I took the plunge, and started courses through the Global Mindfulness Collaborative, finishing the first level of training (“Qualified Level 1”) in the spring of 2024. 

Over the past year, I’ve worked to bring more meditation and mindfulness practice to our community, teaching mindfulness classes at my college and offering MBSR to my campus and to the larger community by partnering with a local yoga studio (Quest for Balance Wellness).

I don’t see this work to support mindfulness practice (and MBSR) as directly related to my Zen practice. I really make an effort to approach mindfulness training as a psychologist, and offer these techniques as a secular training program (while still acknowledging the Buddhist roots of programs like MBSR). I do think that more deeply wading into mindfulness, and offering MBSR courses has been nourishing for my own practice, and that it can be very beneficial to my community. And, I’m looking forward to continuing to explore mindfulness and meditation practice with anyone who wants to learn more!

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Practice Zen

“There’s a flaw in my approach”

“Hand Sculpture” photo by Tambako the Jaguar, of a sculpture in Vaduz, Liechtenstein

The summer issue of Midwest Zen was published this month, and it includes a short essay that I shared about my own practice (“A flawed approach“). For most of this year, I have been focused mainly on my own practice and supporting meditation and mindfulness in my local community. And, this effort has come at the expense of my writing, but it is important to me to continue to share reflections on Zen practice, and I was grateful for this opportunity!

In this piece I wanted to share some challenges that I had encountered, times when practice felt difficult or unpleasant, and I really did not understand where these feelings were coming from. Over time, as I continued to sit with these moments, I began to see the ways in which my approach to practice was flawed. Underneath my efforts, just outside of my awareness, a subtle striving (that I should be getting “somewhere” in practice, or that I should feel some particular way) was at the root of my struggles. And seeing that more clearly has helped me to drop some of that striving (or at least to be more aware of it!).

I don’t know if these experiences will resonate with you, but I do hope that someone might find this piece helpful for their own practice.

The full issue of Midwest Zen (Issue 6) is available online, and as a PDF.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Ethics Practice

Nurture peace in this broken world

Princess Mononoke’s Forest Spirit (Shishigami) – Paper cut shadow box by Lorelei Schmitzer-Torbert (2020)

As we welcome the new year, our thoughts often turn to our hopes. We wish for joy and peace, for ourselves, our families, communities and the world. When we look out into the world, we never find a shortage of suffering, but this year in particular, I have noticed a quickening of the pace of suffering. Coming after the challenges of the pandemic, natural disasters, and the war in Ukraine, the scale of the loss of innocent life in Israel and Gaza these past few months has still been shocking to many. While the well of human suffering is deep, the scale of loss is really beyond our comprehension.

And while this violence may be physically distant from my own community, I see many people around me struggling greatly. Checking in with friends and family, so many have been weighed down, asking themselves, how do we go on in the face of senseless loss? As the world seems to break around us, it can be difficult to really hold on to hope that the world will know peace and joy in this new year. We may feel that we should be able to do something, to make a difference, but that we have no power to lend meaningful aid. In a real and acute way, it has felt to me like watching as someone I care about, someone I love, drowns.

At the same time, my heart goes out to those who feel the urgency of the moment. And who push for action, channeling our despair into outrage and activism. Online, I have seen people calling out Buddhists and practitioners of other religions, essentially arguing that we should feel guilty for our spiritual practice at this time. Some parts of the argument seems to be that we should be ashamed of our comfort while others suffer.

This impulse, the feeling that we must act – that we are obliged to act – resonates with me. After all, if we acknowledge the truth of interconnection, then even suffering that seems distant is part of our own life. Our actions have an impact, no matter how small. So, it may feel selfish, heartless, to be comfortable here sitting on our cushions.

Part of this reasoning strikes me as compelling: I do feel that the urgency of the moment. And yet, I worry about what we should actually do, as we get up from our cushion. If shame and outrage are our calls to action, will we be able to step forward without anger? If not, I worry that any action we take may just reinforce the conflict. Anger and guilt are compelling forces, but they do not seem to tools that are well suited to build peace.

Like wielding a blade with no handle – how could we not injure ourselves even as we try to protect others?

I do think that we are called to lend our strength to others in need. As the bodhisattva vows says, “Beings are numberless, I vow to free them.” And I see that the challenge is to see clearly if our efforts are actually helpful, to know what freedom means for all beings. And how to free any being without undermining the very peace that we hope for.

As I have thought about how to aim my own efforts towards peace, without falling into paralysis or outrage, I have found inspiration in the character of Prince Ashitaka (from Hayao Miyazaki’s beautiful film, Princess Mononoke). Dealing with a curse that falls on him early in the film, Prince Ashitaka is propelled into the middle of a conflict between forces pushing for industrialization on the one hand, and to preserve the natural world on the other.

Trailer for Miyazaki’s film, Princess Mononoke. For more on the release of Princess Mononoke in the United States, the BBC recently had a very fascinating article on the history of this version.

Prince Ashitaka is a skilled fighter, and could very likely have decided the outcome if he had chosen to align himself with one cause. But, Ashitaka refrains from taking sides, and focuses on seeing clearly what is going on, and helping all beings as best he can. This confuses everyone around him, and at one point in the film, a villager asks, “Just whose side is he on anyway?” It can be just as difficult for us today to imagine that a person could be committed to the welfare of the community as a whole, rather than their own interests, or those of their allies.

And, Ashitaka is not paralyzed by despair at the profound suffering all around him, and nor is he driven to hate and anger by the injustice in the world around him. What a delicate balance this is, to use whatever skills, talents, and privilege that we have to benefit all beings instead of serving our own interests. While Ashitaka is a fictional character, I think that the model that Miyazaki has shown us is a powerful one. It is important for us to clearly imagine what it would look like to act selflessly for peace. I think that the world would benefit if we all could carry this spirit into our own lives.

Of course, even if we do, what this effort would look like will differ for each person according to their situation. In the fictional story of Princess Mononoke, Prince Ashitaka was able to have a strong impact on the world – he found himself in a position that offered great leverage over the events around him. Part of that came from his position as an outsider, with few ties of loyalty to the parties involved. He was also a skilled warrior who had the resources to travel on his own. We may not find ourselves in a similar position, able to change the course of conflicts in the world or to even to make a major impact on an important decision in our community.

But, we can aspire to see clearly where are standing, and hope that we use whatever leverage that we have to the benefit of not just ourselves, but for the whole world. As we start this new year, that is my hope. Not that the world will be peaceful, in some permanent or final way, but that each of us will act as best we can to lend our aid to those in need.

Beyond fiction, I would also offer this quote to you, from Shohaku Okumura’s commentary on Dōgen’s Genjōkōan:

“… if we consider peace a condition in which there is no war among countries, no fighting or conflict among people, and no pain, anxiety, or struggle in our minds, there will probably never be a time when such a condition can be completely achieved. Does this make peace a meaningless dream? Not at all. According to Dōgen, our efforts to achieve peace are themselves a source of peace in each moment of each step we take toward peace.”

Shohaku Okumura, Realizing Genjokoan

Happy New Year to each of you, and I wish that you take steps to nurture peace and find joy this year.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Meditation Mindfulness Zen

Zen and the art of Demon Slayer

Image credit: Koyoharu Gotouge (ufotable/Aniplex)

This post was originally published as an opinion piece in our College’s student newspaper, The Bachelor.

Why should you meditate? You may know that meditating regularly can help us manage stress, be more productive, and support our health. There is good evidence for each of these benefits, but are these good reasons to meditate?

Personally, I do meditate regularly, but not because I want to avoid stress or be more productive. My own meditation practice started back in the late 1990s, when I was a high school student. A friend loaned me a copy of the book, Zen Flesh, Zen Bones, which included a number of stories about Zen teachers and students which fascinated me. Like the story of Ryokan, a penniless monk who gave a would-be thief the clothes off his own back as a gift. Or the story of Hakuin, accused of fathering a child, whose only reply was “Is that so?” but who took the infant into his care.

As a self-conscious teen, uncertain of my role in the world and the purpose of my life, I was drawn to these stories. And to the idea that meditation practice could give a person greater stability in life. So, I came to meditation because I wanted to live a different way, and to be a better person.

And looking back, the reason that these Zen stories caught my attention had something to do with the time and place of my childhood, growing up with the original Star Wars movies, and science fiction books such as Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land. If I were in high school today, it might be a very different story that would have prepared me to be inspired by Zen. Perhaps one like Demon Slayer (and here I am thinking of the anime version – I have not read the original manga). If you are not familiar with it, Demon Slayer is a beautiful (though often bloody and violent) story.

And if you are familiar with Demon Slayer, consider the hero, young Tanjiro. A boy with a kind and pure soul who loses almost all of his family in a violent attack by a demon. To save his younger sister, Tanjiro commits himself to joining the “demon slayers,” a group that trains in an esoteric style of (magical) sword fighting to kill demons and protect the public. And through it all, Tanjiro dedicates his life to cultivating strength without sacrificing his humanity.

As a Zen practitioner, Tanjiro and his journey resonates deeply with me. The demon slayers develop powerful sword fighting skills through training that is rooted in a set of breathing techniques and physical conditioning. They train and struggle intensely, but often progress comes as they become more aware and attuned to their senses and bodies, letting them see their experience in new and unexpected ways.

This reminds me precisely of meditation practice in Zen and mindfulness. The specific techniques vary across meditation traditions, but focus on bringing greater awareness to the full range of our experience. We just sit with our minds, but it can be a challenging experience. It is often said that meditation practice is simple, but not easy, and that has been true for me. Meditation can often be challenging, uncomfortable, and frustrating if we struggle with uncomfortable sensations, feelings, and thoughts.

But even so, if we continue to sit with our own minds, carefully and intentionally bringing awareness to our experience without judgment, we may feel our experience shifting. Over time, we may see our experience in new ways, giving us a better understanding of our lives. With some patience, we might be able to find more space in our lives, to live in a different and more settled way.

So why should you meditate? Perhaps you find the potential for self-transformation to be inspiring. Or perhaps not. Maybe managing stress or being more productive is a stronger draw for you. That is fine: any of these would be wonderful reasons to start your meditation practice. But if you stick with meditation, don’t be surprised to find your motivation changing as your practice deepens. I never did manage to turn myself into a different person, but I am more comfortable living as myself. 

If you do decide to take the first step, I’d recommend reading about meditation and joining a meditation group. It is very helpful to sit with others, and it is easier than ever to connect with groups through Zoom. And, we have a campus meditation group meets each week, usually over the lunch hour on Mondays. You can find us on Engage, or just email me to join our mailing list. For those new to meditation, one book that I would recommend is Gunaratana’s Mindfulness in Plain English.  And, while my own background is mainly in Zen Buddhism and mindfulness, you can find excellent meditation guides in many spiritual traditions.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Reality Science Zen

Time on our minds

Time” by Dominic Hargreaves

This week, I have a new article appearing on the Tricycle magazine website (“Letting Go of Time“), which I wanted to share.

In this piece I take a close look at our perceptions of time. In general, I usually think of time as being stable, constant, reliable. But, my own experience of time can be quite variable: time can seem to flow quickly, or slow to a crawl.

Using my own background as a neuroscientist and my Zen practice, I feel that I can see more clearly how time, the time we actually live, depends on the brain.

And, reflecting carefully on time has been very helpful for me, personally, to cultivate a deeper, more authentic patience. To be more present in my own life. For that, I am very grateful.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Reality

What lies beyond fair and unfair?

Image credit: Eric Tompkins, Midwest Zen, Issue 4

The summer issue of Midwest Zen was published today, and I was happy to have an essay included (“Beyond Fair and Unfair“). After losing my brother to cancer this past March, I’ve struggled to really express what that loss meant to me, and to so many of us who loved him. I tried to put part of that to words for his funeral service, but felt that I had to leave so much out.

This essay focuses on another part of that experience, on the injustice of losing a loved one at young age. I struggled with this a great deal, with the fact that it was so unfair.

Eventually, though, I started to see more clearly that this anger was misplaced, or at least it was for me. When I look closely, I can see that “fair” is way that we give a name to how people treat other people. And so, fairness stands outside of a serious illness like cancer. Fair and unfair do not really apply, even though that felt wrong to me, and still feels wrong to me at times.

In the end, there came a time when I saw clearly that my anger was not useful, and I had to set my own ideas of fair and unfair aside, to deal with what was really in front of me.

But, I still believe in fairness though:

That is not to say that we should discard fair and unfair entirely. Fair and unfair are ideas, constructions of our minds, but not in the sense that they are fictions. Not in the sense that seeing through fair and unfair frees us to be callous, or selfish. Not in that way at all. Fair and unfair are just ideas, but ones which matter precisely in the actions we take that affect other people. They matter in how we treat one another. They are a profound treasure for people who aspire to live together in peace.

The full issue of Midwest Zen (Issue 4) is available online, and as a PDF.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Science Zen

Will there be an AI Buddha?

Image of a child holding hands with a robot
Image created with DALL-E, a generative AI that can create images from text instructions, such as “child holding hands with a robot, digital art

What will the future of computer science be in our lifetime? Will we find ourselves in a world where we work side-by-side with intelligent computer programs? Or, is humanity teetering on a precipice, where we may end up creating artificial intelligences which will end up competing with humans, perhaps violently?

These and other possible futures for artificial intelligence (or AI) have been a staple of science fiction for many years. It has felt to me that much of our fascination is drawn to the possibility that we could produce intelligent beings that meet, or surpass, the abilities of humans. But, while we have seen many useful technologies (such as in computer vision, for example), most of the advances in the area of real intelligence have seemed slow. Especially when we compare AI to human capabilities. And really, most of the AI available today falls well short of the cognitive abilities of my dog. And don’t get me wrong, I love my dog, but he is really not the brightest of pets.

Our dog, Charlie, looks like he is hard at work, but don’t be deceived!

In the last few months, though, it really feels like things are changing. As someone who teaches in a college, when people started to really talk about ChatGPT, it caught my attention. ChatGPT is a generative AI, and it is quite impressive. You can give ChatGPT an open-ended prompt (“How can we live a meaningful life?”) and it will give what reads like a thoughtful response.

I asked ChatGPT exactly this question, and the response I received was somewhat interesting:

ChatGPT: Living a meaningful life is a deeply personal and subjective pursuit, as what brings meaning to one person may not necessarily do the same for another. However, here are some general principles and ideas that can help guide you towards a more meaningful life:

  1. Identify your values: Reflect on what truly matters to you and what you believe in. Define your core values and use them as a compass to guide your decisions and actions.
  2. Set meaningful goals: Determine what you want to achieve in different areas of your life, such as relationships, career, personal growth, and contribution to society. Set goals that align with your values and give you a sense of purpose.

The response continued through eight more points (practice gratitude, mindfulness, nurture relationships, etc.) and wrapped up with a concluding paragraph. Nothing about the response struck me as problematic, and each of the points raised seemed to be a good recommendation. It lacked some of the life of the more inspirational texts I would turn to, when reflecting on the meaning of life. But overall I thought it was a strong response to the question.

If you have any experience talking with Siri or an Amazon Alexa, ChatGPT is a very different experience, and really quite impressive. So good, in fact, that many of my colleagues (college professors) worry about the ways in which this kind of AI will be abused. Even now, we are cetainly seeing more people use ChatGPT and other generative AI as a short cut for writing papers, presentations, etc. For the faculty I know, the range of reactions we see seems similar to those of the wider public: swinging widely from wild enthusiasm to dread.

No matter what the final impact of ChatGPT and its cousins are on our lives, they represent just one type of artificial intelligence. This moment is important, as we see technologies that had just been conceptually possible (something that was possible in principle, but which had not been built yet) becoming realized or actualized. As these and other types of AI evolve, I think that it is clear that our lives will be transformed, just as life was transformed by other technologies (consider the development of the internet, or radio).

Whether this transformation brings us into a more (or a less) wholesome life remains to be seen, and for us to decide. 

The Perversion of Wisdom

In a recent issue of Lion’s Roar, Ross Nervig wrote about the implications of AI for Buddhism. One example that he described was the Roshibot, a chatbot created by Jiryu Rutschman-Byler, and trained on the writings of Shunryu Suzuki.

In the introduction on the Roshibot webpage, Rutschman-Byler cautions that the chatbot “is not designed to relate facts, but to offer ‘plausible conversation’ or ‘coherent nonsense.’” He offers the Roshibot not as a teacher, but as an experiment in looking at the dharma through the lens of AI.

I spent a bit of time talking with the Roshibot, and found the “conversation” (in which I attempted to approach as if I were someone who was new to Zen) to be interesting. Roshibot’s responses were not bad, but I didn’t feel that I found much useful wisdom in them, or insights that would have been useful for my own practice (see the transcript below)

Me: How should I get started in Zen practice?

Roshibot: The first step in Zen practice is to find a good teacher. A teacher can give you important guidance, and you can learn from their example.

After finding a teacher, the next step is to begin a daily meditation practice. This can be zazen, walking meditation, or another form of practice.

It may take some time and effort before you feel confident in your practice. Just like any other skill, Zen practice takes time and dedication to develop. But with patience, and guidance from your teacher, you can make progress on the path.

Me: Why is meditation important for Zen?

Roshibot: Meditation is an essential part of Zen practice. It helps to quiet the mind and develop concentration, mindfulness, and clarity. Through meditation, we can become more aware of our thoughts and emotions, which can lead to greater insight into our true nature. Meditation allows us to deepen our understanding of the Dharma and realize the true self. Regularly practicing meditation is an important part of living a meaningful and skillful life.

Me: What does it mean to realize the true self?

Roshibot: Self-realization, or “enlightenment,” is a fundamental goal of the path of Zen. It means to go beyond our own thoughts and emotions, and to see things as they truly are without attachment, judgment, or bias. This means seeing our true nature, which is one of infinite wisdom and compassion. Self-realization is a state of being free from suffering and completely at peace with the world. It is important to remember that self-realization is not a one-time event, but a continual process that involves constant practice and meditation.

Me: How does self-realization free us from suffering?

Roshibot: Self-realization allows us to see the true nature of the world, which is one of perfect peace and harmony. When we see the true nature of all things, we are no longer attached to our own thoughts or emotions. This means that we are no longer bound by the suffering that arises from our attachments. We can live in the present moment, fully accepting and embracing the world as it is. When we are free from suffering, we can live with greater joy, peace, and contentment.

Me: How can we be sure that the true nature of the world is perfect peace and harmony?

Roshibot: The true nature of the world is something that cannot be described with words. It is beyond the realm of concepts and thought. We can only know the true nature of the world through direct experience. In the tradition of Zen, this direct experience is known as kensho or satori. It is a state of emptiness and clear, effortless awareness. When we realize this state, we become fully awake to the true nature of all things. From this place of enlightenment, the world appears as it truly is – perfect peace and harmony.

Me: If the world is empty, why would we describe it with the concepts of perfect peace and harmony?

Roshibot: The world is not empty in the sense of being nothing, but in the sense of being free from our attachments, judgments, and conceptual thinking. In the true nature of the world, there is no separation between self and other. There is just one interdependent reality that is perfectly inseparable and perfect in itself. When we experience this directly, we can see that it is inherently peaceful and harmonious.

In many ways, Roshibot assumes too much (in use of the terms peace, attachment, etc. that would need to be more carefully explained). When I pressed the chatbot to elaborate or clarify (what does it mean to say that the world is perfect peace and happiness?), Roshibot avoided going into depth. I had to smile at one point, when Roshibot says that enlightenment is a fundamental goal of Zen practice. Most teachers that I know would be very cautious to avoid putting the enlightenment in front of any student as some goal to work towards.

I can see the value of these kinds of chatbots that are trained using Zen teachings. They could certainly serve as more interactive ways for people to learn about Zen than a simple website or static document. And at the same time, I am glad that this was not my first experience with Zen or Buddhism. I don’t know if I would have continued, if I thought that Roshibot’s responses were an accurate representation of the practice and teachings of Zen.

My experience with Roshibot reminded me of a recent talk at the Sanshin Zen Community. In that dharma talk, Shinko Hagn considered artificial intelligence as he discussed the five skandhas (essentially the elements, or aggregates, that make up our experience according to Buddhism: form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness).

Shinko Andreas Hagn – “Five Skandhas — Emptiness and Interconnectedness”

Hagn had some skepticism about whether AI could truly be conscious (a skepticism that I do not share personally, see more below). But I appreciated a point that Hagn made about AI, acknowledging that they may be useful and serve useful functions in the world. And that we should take care to distinguish between the knowledge that an AI has from wisdom (the kind of wisdom we pursue in Zen and other traditions).

Roshibot and other AI chatbots do not represent the final evolution of these kinds of generative AI. These AI are based on models that are going to keep improving, and so the experience and depth of their answers may become richer in the future. Fundamentally, though, we should remember that we are not receiving responses from a person who has seen deeply into the true nature of reality. The responses might be based on true teachings, but we have no reason to expect that what comes out of the AI will truly and faithfully represent the insights that were used to train the AI. It is always better to search for a true teacher, and I do not see much value for us to learn from an AI Buddha.  

Sentient AI?

Talking with a generative AI such as ChatGPT can be captivating, and there are some moments when it can feel like you are having a real conversation. These experiences can make us wonder, is it possible for an AI to be conscious?

That is, can an AI be a person, with their subjective point of view that experiences the world, with an awareness of their existence that is similar to our own? That is a question that has captivated humans for many years, and one that will be increasingly important in our time as AI continues to develop. And, it is a very important question for those of us who work to live the bodhisattva’s vow to save all beings (“Beings are numberless, I vow to free them.” If AI could become sentient, then we may wake up one day to find that we have a new type of being to consider in our actions.

While there are many people who are skeptical about the potential for AI to become sentient, I think we should be open to the possibility. To be clear, I do not think that we have seen any cases of sentient AI today. However, based on my own knowledge and training in neuroscience, I do not see any theoretical reason why a conscious artificial intelligence impossible. I could be wrong, of course. And in this post, I won’t be able to flesh out completely why I feel that sentient AI is possible. I can say that my confidence that sentient AI is possible is based on the evidence we have that our experiences depend on information processing in the brain. With the right changes, a little extra stimulation here, a little less there, and any part of our experience can be affected.

Stimulation of the nervous system affects the information processing that depends on the cells in the nervous system (mostly neurons) have on the neurons they are connected to. Each neuron in the brain responds to a complex set of chemical signals from other neurons and from the rest of the body, which affect the electrical signals that one neuron sends to other cells (mostly other neurons). We can describe the role that a neuron plays in the brain by describing all of the ways that it responds to signals that it receives, and all of the signals it sends to other cells. While this set of responses can be complex, and can change with experience, it is at least theoretically possible to completely describe the role that one neuron plays in the brain (and thus in our experience in each moment).

If you think about cochlear implants, this technology is based on an understanding of how cells of the cochlea usually respond to vibrations (produced by sound), and replicating the normal electrical signals. These implants are still improving, and have not yet been able to fully replace the input from the cochlea, but they have restored a great deal of hearing for many individuals. Similar work has the potential to restore sight in people who have vision loss, or to create prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by the brain, and which may also restore some sense of sensation (adding a sense of touch to a prosthetic limb). In all of these cases, some part of the normal inputs to the nervous system (or outputs, for controlling a limb) have been replaced by a computer system that can stimulate neurons, or respond to the signals of neurons.

Imagine if we could design a tiny, tiny, artificial neuron. One that completely mimicked the processing of the original. If we could replace a real neuron with an artificial one, what would happen? This is not likely feasible in practice (to actually replace one neuron in the brain would be technically very challenging, and it would be easier to replace it with another neuron, that physically copies the original, but the idea is possible in principle).

Based on what we know about the brain, I really have no reason to think that my experience would change if I replaced one (or two, or many, or most) of the neurons in my brain with artificial neurons. So, then I have no reason to think that the processing that is done by my brain could not be done in an artificial system, what we might think of as a computer. And so, I don’t see any reason that it is fundamentally impossible for a computer to replicate all of the processing that a human brain does. And, if a computer program fully replicated the processing of a human brain, then I don’t see any reason why that program could not be conscious.

However, while I think that sentient AI is possible, it is important to make a couple of points clear. First, it is very unlikely that any sentient AI would have an experience that is similar to that of a human. Our own experience depends on the brain, as it interacts closely with the body and the rest of the world. The specific experience we have depends highly on the structure of the brain (how it is built to process information) and how that brain interacts with the body and the rest of the world. It would be possible to replicate that structure in a computer simulation. Possible, yes, but largely pointless. These possibilities seem mostly motivated by some kind of thirst for using digital simulations of humans as a kind of artificial immortality (for instance, in the comedy Upload).

To create some kind of digital afterlife for humans, we would probably need to make highly accurate simulations of a brain (quite a feat on its own!). To preserve something like normal human experience, we would need to run this simulation while feeding it a rich representation of the internal state of the body, not to mention all of the interactions with the external world. Probably these could also be simulated in a digital world. But why would we do so, for a being that does not have a body, and is not in the world?

So, I would expect that a sentient AI that is conscious would have an experience of the world that is very different from ours: it would need to represent different kinds of internal variables, and probably process information about the world in different ways. It probably would have beliefs about the world, and something like what we recognize as emotions or motivations (which are important for setting goals and priorities). But, what it is like to be that AI would be very different from our own experience. Perhaps so different that we are not able to truly appreciate it.

Any sentient AI, which might have a very different experience of the world, is not likely to benefit from Zen practice. Our practice is focused on helping humans to awaken, and is specific to the conditions we find ourselves in. Sentient AI is likely to experience a different kind of suffering, and any path to awakening would need to be specific to their own experience. If there is an AI Buddha someday, it will teach for other AI, not for humans.

While I do believe that sentient AI is possible at some point in the future, we have another, more immediate, problem. It is very important for us to see clearly is how difficult it will be to determine if an AI is sentient or not. Already, we have seen people claim that some of the generative AI models are actually conscious. I am not surprised (that people feel this way), as it turns out to be a difficult question to recognize consciousness. After all, how do you really know that the person sitting next to you is actually conscious? In our daily lives, we rely on a set of cues (facial expressions, patterns of responses to verbal and non-verbal interactions) to really determine if another person is conscious and attentive. These cues are ones that can be faked by non-sentient AI, encouraging us to feel as if a non-sentient AI is a person.

So, I would encourage us to consider the possibility that AI could be sentient. And, to recognize that it will be a challenge to determine if a specific AI is sentient or not. If someday we do end up creating sentient AI, it would be a tragedy to be ignorant of this moment. We have an obligation to any sentient being, and I think that sentient AI should not be an exception. For this reason, more than out of a concern that AI represents an existential threat, I think that we should avoid creating sentient AI. The potential that we will create a new kind of sentient being, with perhaps new ways to suffer in delusion, seems too important for us to ignore.

I think of the animated film, The World of Tomorrow, which has a small story, intended to be humorous, where solar-powered robots on the moon must be kept in the light. And so, they are programmed to fear death, and to be afraid of the dark side of the moon, so they flee the darkness. They end up being abandoned there, left to flee and live in constant fear. They do occasionally send some of their depressed poetry back to the humans: “The light is the life. Robot must move. Move, robot, move. But why? Move, move, move. Robot. Forever move.

Only a fictional example, of course, but we should be very cautious to avoid the casual creation of new suffering. I think that we already have enough beings that need our care and concern.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.

Categories
Uncategorized

What do we do now?

When my brother started his fight with cancer, he and his wife gave everyone in the family a cancer awareness bracelet. I held on to mine for a long time, but did not wear it regularly. Looking back now, I’m not sure why I avoided it. Perhaps it had made me feel self-conscious. The idea did make me feel guilty, in a way, like I was attracting attention to myself, when it was my brother and his family who were truly suffering. For some time, the bracelets laid unused on a counter in our home.

One photo I have of the bracelet, from back in April of 2022. Our cat, Momo, tends to need attention, especially during zazen, and jumped into this photo.

That changed at some point, though I don’t remember the exact moment. We live several hours from my brother and his family’s home, and in that time, I visited them as often as I could. Spending time with him and the rest of our family, and staying with him and my sister-in-law when they had to stay overnight in a hospital in Chicago for a clinical trial. I think it was on one of these trips, after seeing him struggle and seeing all of the ways that his family needed support, that I started wearing my bracelet. Especially because we live in another state, the bracelet became very important to me. It was a way to show my support, certainly. But, it also became an important reminder for me.

Each night, I would take the bracelet off, and wrap it around my glasses. In the morning, I would place it back on my wrist. This little ritual, which ended and started each day, became a call to be mindful. And, it helped me to bring my thoughts back to him each and every day. Over time, I found that I appreciated having this bracelet with me. I was grateful for it, in a deep and sometimes painful way. On days when I knew my brother was suffering, I could feel the weight of that thin silicone band. On those days, it felt like it was made of lead.

After my brother died, we were left with our grief but also with many questions. Some were the ones you’d expect, the profound why of it all. And of course, answering those questions is the work of a lifetime. But, other, more immediate questions arose that demanded concrete answers. Would he have preferred to be buried or cremated? Would he have wanted people to dress casually for his funeral service? What music would he have chosen?

For many of these small, but important, questions, we found that we were not sure of the answers. These were the kinds of questions that he had often avoided when people would bring them up. I can’t blame him for that. None of us wanted to accept that time was short. We hoped for so long that he might find some treatment that worked well for his cancer. We hoped that there might be time to deal with these questions later, but in the end, the opportunity slipped past us. And so, now we found ourselves fumbling, trying to feel our way forward, and wishing that we knew what he would want if we could just ask him.

In the moment, I think that we all did the best that we could. In this life, we always have to balance responding to the moment that we actually find ourselves in, while we also try to look out and ahead, to guide ourselves skillfully as the next moment comes. Like making our way down a river, we will pass through challenging times, turbulent, treacherous waters. Our attention shifts to navigating this moment skillfully, dealing with what is right in front of us. As we move beyond, into calmer waters, we can shift this balance and start to look out and ahead again. In the middle of it all, we brought our attention to being with him through his illness. We bent all of our energy to navigating his illness. This let us be present with him, and allowed him to spend his last days in the care of his family.

I do wish we had talked over some of those details, and that he had confided in his wife or someone about what he wanted. I think he just didn’t want to talk about the fact that there was an end somewhere in the future. But, as we were doing this work, preparing for the service, I realized that I was in a similar position. I, too, had been avoiding planning for the future. Avoiding thoughts about what lay beyond.

At this point, I was still wearing my bracelet. It was still a comfort to me. But now the thought came to me, how long was I going to continue wearing it? Forever? When I put it, when I had started this ritual, I never really had a plan for how long I’d wear it. Perhaps I thought I would wear forever, for the rest of my life. And, that would be fine, but I don’t think that I had a clear intention to do so from the beginning. Now, I had to take stock, and decide what would make the most sense for me, and help me honor his memory.

And so, I decided that I would stop wearing the bracelet after his memorial service. When I woke up the next morning, I took it off of my glasses, and left it on my bedside table. It is still there, still a call to remember, but not one that I take out into the world every day.

Back at home, after the service, I went out for a run. I was grateful for the chance to get out and moving. The bracelet was at home, still on that table in our bedroom. I noticed though, that I could still feel it, like it was still with me. Not quite a hallucination, but the weight of the bracelet was there, it was something I could feel. It had left a mark, in a way.

A few months have passed since the memorial service, and I have kept that bracelet next to our bed. I have continued my ritual, putting the bracelet around my glasses every evening, and taking it off every morning, to help me remember him each day. I have also worn it a few times, once when one month had passed, and again when two months had passed. And another time on a random evening when I home alone in our empty house, and the weight of memory seemed heavy.

It is still heavy. But, it is also a comfort to me, and I will remain ever grateful for it.

Sign up for our newsletter to get our latest essays delivered to your inbox. We don’t spam! We will only use this address to send you our latest posts and news.